Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2012 Sep;97(9):732–741. doi: 10.1002/bip.22041

Table 1. Intensity thresholds for pre-processing Challenge cryo-EM density maps.

For each cryo-EM map, the suggested contour level for visualization is given (column 2), as well as our computed threshold for small voxels (column 4). The percent of voxels larger than each threshold is provided (column 3: suggested contour level, column 5: computed threshold), as well as the absolute difference between these two thresholds (column 6). The percent of voxels larger than the threshold is equivalent to the percent of voxels from the cryo-EM map that are used in constructing the affinity matrix, A.

map EMDB contour % voxels > τ computed τ % voxels > τ difference in %
AQPO NA NA 2.49 5 NA
Epsilon-15 7.3 Å 1.6 6 1.32 9 3
GroEL 4 Å 0.60 11 0.77 7 4
GroEL+GroES 7.7Å 0.61 37 0.75 27 9
GroEL+GroES 23.5Å .029 5 .087 3 2
Mm-cpn 4.3 Å 0.38 2 0.45 1 1
Mm-cpn 8.0 Å 0.78 7 0.95 11 4
Ribosome 6.4 Å 3.5 2 5.5 1 1
Ribosome 7.4 Å 0.17 13 0.49 5 8
Ribosome 8.9 Å 70.4 5 88.5 4 1
Rotavirus 3.8 Å 1.04 4 0.98 5 1