Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 16;18(11):852–858. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0649

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Microcomputerized tomography analysis of fiber-bonded scaffolds before (A) and after (B) cryopreservation. No significant difference was found in terms of scaffold morphology. A quantitative analysis was also performed to compare the total porosity of scaffolds before and after cryopreservation (C). The values of average porosity before and after cryopreservation were not significantly different (p>0.05).