Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 2;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-13-19

Table 3.

Comparisons of existing sialidase assay methods

  TBA assay TLC Radiochemical method 1 H-NMR HPLC Fluorescence assay Spectophotometric assay
Substrates
Sialosides
Sialosides
Sialosides
Sialosides
Sialosides
4MU-Neu5Ac
pNP-Neu5Ac
Reagents
Arsenite, TBA
Resorcinol or diphenylamine
Radiolabelled gangliosides
Deuterated buffer
Malonitrile
Normal buffer
Normal buffer
Instruments
Spectrometer
TLC plate
HPTLC and radiochromatoscanner
NMR facility
HPLC and fluorimeter
Fluorimeter
Spectrophotometer
Time to run
hours
hours
hours
hours
hours
10 min
10 min
Safety issue
5TC toxic
Hazardous in case of skin contact
Radioactive substrate
Strong magnet
None
None
None
Automation
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Cost per run
Cheap
Cheap
Expensive
Very Expensive
Expensive
Expensive and substrate unstable
Cheap
Substrate specificity
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Enzyme kinetics
Inaccurate; Time consuming
Not applicable
Costly; Time consuming
Costly; Time consuming
Costly; Time consuming
Yes
Yes
Reference(s) [8] [9] [10] [3,11] [20] [7,12,16] [12]