Table 1.
Beta coefficients and Odds ratios for the final model.
| |
Type of variable |
Beta coefficients |
Odds ratios |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 95% CI | 90% CI | Median | 95% CI | 90% CI | ||
| Intercept |
|
−1.07 |
[−1.53, -0.64] |
[−1.42, -0.73] |
0.34 |
[0.22, 0.53] |
[0.24, 0.48] |
| Proportion of cattle farms becoming bTB positive from 2005 to 2006 (%) |
QS |
0.62(a)(b) |
[0.06, 1.22] |
[0.18, 1.09] |
1.86(a)(b) |
[1.06, 3.39] |
[1.19, 2.97] |
| Mean number of hunting seasons in which the hunting estates of the municipality have been inspected |
QS |
0.55(a)(b) |
[0.09, 1.02] |
[0.19, 0.91] |
1.73(a)(b) |
[1.09, 2.77] |
[1.21, 2.49] |
| Apparent TB prevalence in wild boars in the municipality in the game season 2006-07 |
QS |
0.66(a)(b) |
[0.18, 1.28] |
[0.27, 1.14] |
1.94(a)(b) |
[1.20, 3.59] |
[1.32, 3.11] |
| Number of sampled cattle in the cattle farms included in the sanitary plan in 2006 |
QS |
0.61(b) |
[−0.05, 1.30] |
[0.10, 1.14] |
1.85(b) |
[0.96, 3.66] |
[1.10, 3.13] |
| Number of cattle farms with at least one bTB-positive animal in 2006 |
QS |
0.66(b) |
[−0.04, 1.38] |
[0.11, 1.22] |
1.94(b) |
[0.96, 3.98] |
[1.11, 3.40] |
| Number of “TB-positive” red deers in the municipality in the game season 2006-07 |
QS |
0.53(b) |
[−0.08, 1.22] |
[0.05, 1.06] |
1.69(b) |
[0.93, 3.38] |
[1.05, 2.90] |
| Proportion of cattle farms classified as extensive beef breeding farms in 2006 (%) |
QS |
0.39(b) |
[−0.09, 0.87] |
[0.01, 0.76] |
1.47(b) |
[0.92, 2.39] |
[1.02, 2.14] |
| Number of farms devoted to bullfighting cattle in 2006 | QS | 0.14 | [−0.24, 0.56] | [−0.16, 0.47] | 1.15 | [0.79, 1.76] | [0.85, 1.60] |
(QS) = quantitative standardized variable; (D) = dichotomous variable (codified considering the median).
(a): Significant coefficients of the final model using the 95% CI.
(b): Significant coefficients of the final model using the 90% CI.