Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2012 Aug 16;142(1-3):90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.048

Table 1.

Model Fitting Procedure.

Shared Liability Model

# Model Description Comparison Δdf Δχ2 p-value ΔAIC

1 Full model n/a (6109) (−2LL=9012.77) n/a (−3205.23)
2 Set shared environmental influences to 0 2 vs. 1 5 0.12 1.00 −9.88
3 Drop genetic correlation between MD and INIT (a21) 3 vs. 2 1 5.00 0.03 3.00
4 Drop environmental correlation between MD and INIT (e21) 4 vs. 2 1 0.17 0.68 −1.83
5 Drop direct genetic correlation between MD and FTND (a31) 5 vs. 4 1 8.29 <.01 6.29
61 Drop direct environmental correlation between MD and FTND (e31) 6 vs. 4 1 1.48 0.23 −0.53

Reciprocal Causation Model

# Model Description Comparison Δdf Δχ2 p-value ΔAIC

1 Full model n/a (6110) (−2LL=9010.91) n/a (−3209.09)
2 Set shared environmental influences to 0 2 vs. 1 4 2.08 0.72 −5.92
3 Drop genetic correlation between MD and INIT (a21) 3 vs. 2 1 0.48 0.49 −1.52
4 Drop environmental correlation between MD and INIT (e21) 4 vs. 3 1 0.60 0.44 −1.40
52 Test causal path from MD to FTND (b31) 5 vs. 4 1 1.10 0.29 −0.90
6 Test causal path from FTND to MD (b13) 6 vs. 5 1 34.92 <0.01 32.92
7 Test causal path from FTND to MD (b13) with b31 intact 7 vs. 4 1 10.80 <0.01 8.80

Final models are in italicized text.

1

Fit statistics for final shared liability model: −2LL=9014.54; degrees of freedom=6116; AIC=−3217.46.

2

Fit statistics for final causal model: −2LL=9015.17; degrees of freedom=6117; AIC=−3218.83.