Table 2.

Odds for Increase in Coronary Artery Calcium Score in 2001–2002 Per 1-Standard Deviation Decline Kidney Function in 1997–1999 (Ordinal Logistic Regression)

Model	Sample Size
		Estimated Glomerular Filtration Ratea (n=421)		Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratiob (n=362)
		Odds Ratio (95% CI)	P value	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	P value
1	421	0.95 (0.80, 1.12)	0.52	-
2	421	1.01 (0.85, 1.20)	0.91	-
3	420	0.99 (0.82, 1.19)	0.90	-
1	362	-		1.04 (0.85, 1.27)	0.68
2	362	-		1.07 (0.86, 1.33)	0.55
3	361	-		1.00 (0.81, 1.23)	0.98
1	362	0.93 (0.77, 1.23)	0.48	1.05 (0.86, 1.28)	0.66
2	362	1.03 (0.85, 1.25)	0.77	1.07 (0.86, 1.33)	0.56
3	361	0.99 (0.81, 1.22)	0.94	1.00 (0.81, 1.24)	1.00
1	362	0.94 (0.78, 1.14)	0.56	0.99 (0.80, 1.24)	0.95
2	362	1.02 (0.84, 1.24)	0.85	1.11 (0.89, 1.39)	0.37
3	361	1.01 (0.81, 1.22)	0.91	0.99 (0.80, 1.27)	0.91

Model 1: Unadjusted

Model 2: Age, sex adjusted

Model 3: Age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides

Urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR); confidence interval (CI); estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

^aOdds Ratio for 1-standard deviation decrease in eGFR

^bOdds Ratio for 1-standard deviation increase in ACR