Table 5.

Parameters of the diagnostic accuracy of the studies selected for evaluating the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT in RCC

Method	Site	Study	Year	Scan	TP	FP	FN	TN	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)
PET	Renal	Ramdave et al.[12]	2001	17	15	0	1	1	94	100
		Miyakita et al.[14]	2002	19	6	0	13	0	32	–
		Aide et al.[17]	2003	35	14	1	16	4	47	80
		Kang et al.[20]	2004	17	9	0	6	2	60	100
		Pooled							62	88
				Scan
	Extra-renal	Ramdave et al.[12]	2001	17	2	0	0	15	100	100
		Chang et al.[13]	2002	15	9	1	1	4	90	80
		Aide et al.[17]	2003	53	10	3	0	40	100	93
		Jadvar et al.[18]	2003	25	15	1	6	3	71	75
		Majhail et al.[19]	2003	24	14	0	7	3	67	100
		Kang et al.[20]	2004	52	46	0	6	0	88	–
		Nakatani et al.[22]	2009	28	17	2	4	5	81	71
		Llano et al.[24]	2010	58	29	3	7	19	81	86
		Pooled							79	90
				Lesion
		Safaei et al.[15]	2002	25	15	2	2	6	88	75
		Wu et al.[16]	2002	52	40	0	0	12	100	100
		Majhail et al.[19]	2003	36	21	0	12	3	64	100
		Pooled							84	91
				Scan
PET/CT	Renal	Ozulker et al.[25]	2011	18	7	1	8	2	47	67
	Extra-renal	Park et al.[21]	2009	35	30	5	2	26	94	84
		Kumar et al.[23]	2010	103	63	3	7	30	90	91
		Pooled							91	88

FN, false-negative; FP, false-positive; TN, true-negative; TP, true-positive.