Table 5.
Method | Site | Study | Year | Scan | TP | FP | FN | TN | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PET | Renal | Ramdave et al.[12] | 2001 | 17 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 94 | 100 |
Miyakita et al.[14] | 2002 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 32 | – | ||
Aide et al.[17] | 2003 | 35 | 14 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 47 | 80 | ||
Kang et al.[20] | 2004 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 60 | 100 | ||
Pooled | 62 | 88 | ||||||||
Scan | ||||||||||
Extra-renal | Ramdave et al.[12] | 2001 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 100 | 100 | |
Chang et al.[13] | 2002 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 90 | 80 | ||
Aide et al.[17] | 2003 | 53 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 100 | 93 | ||
Jadvar et al.[18] | 2003 | 25 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 71 | 75 | ||
Majhail et al.[19] | 2003 | 24 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 67 | 100 | ||
Kang et al.[20] | 2004 | 52 | 46 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 88 | – | ||
Nakatani et al.[22] | 2009 | 28 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 81 | 71 | ||
Llano et al.[24] | 2010 | 58 | 29 | 3 | 7 | 19 | 81 | 86 | ||
Pooled | 79 | 90 | ||||||||
Lesion | ||||||||||
Safaei et al.[15] | 2002 | 25 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 88 | 75 | ||
Wu et al.[16] | 2002 | 52 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 100 | 100 | ||
Majhail et al.[19] | 2003 | 36 | 21 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 64 | 100 | ||
Pooled | 84 | 91 | ||||||||
Scan | ||||||||||
PET/CT | Renal | Ozulker et al.[25] | 2011 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 47 | 67 |
Extra-renal | Park et al.[21] | 2009 | 35 | 30 | 5 | 2 | 26 | 94 | 84 | |
Kumar et al.[23] | 2010 | 103 | 63 | 3 | 7 | 30 | 90 | 91 | ||
Pooled | 91 | 88 |
FN, false-negative; FP, false-positive; TN, true-negative; TP, true-positive.