Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2008 Jun 19;80(14):5279–5285. doi: 10.1021/ac800763r

Table 1.

Comparison of ECL Sensor and LC–MS Nanoreactor Data to in Vivo Toxicity

substrate (film) initial slopea turnover rateb LC-UV turnoverc TD50d,e
NPYR (RLM) 0.144 (±0.015) 781(±176) 12.9(±2.6) 1.52
NPYR (h2E1) 0.216 (±0.021) 779(±208) 11.6(±2.4)
NNK (RLM) 0.116 (±0.004) 629(±128) 14.0(±2.8) 1.80
NNK (h2E1) 0.230 (±0.029)) 832(±233) 10.9(±2.2)
NPIP (RLM) 0.110 (±0.011) 594(±132) 13.4(±2.7) 1.50
styrene (RLM) 0.036 (±0.011) 196(±126) ndf 23.3g
styrene (h2E1) 0.051 (±0.017) 184(±77) nd
a

In units of min−1.

b

Relative values from ECL arrays, in min−1 (mg of protein)−1; obtained by dividing initial slope by amount of protein based on QCM (Si, Table S1).

c

Relative values from LC-UV absorbance, in abs. units (normalized protein × s)−1.

d

TD50, chronic dose (mg/kg of body weight per day) inducing mixed liver tumors in half of test rat population at end of standard life span.23

e

Ad libitum in drinking water.

f

Not detected within 30-min reaction time.

g

Gavage administration.