Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 18;2012:952508. doi: 10.1155/2012/952508

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism.

Number of studies Number of participants in case/control Summary effect estimate 95% CI Tests for heterogeneity
CC genotype Comparator genotype
Subgroup by sex

Pooled studies for sex I 2 (%)
 CT versus CC 11 1,650/1,833 1,420/1,523 1.04 0.94–1.16 χ² = 14.28, df = 10 (P = 0.16) 30
 TT versus CC 11 1,650/1,833 326/425 0.87 0.75–1.01 χ² = 14.01, df = 10 (P = 0.17) 29
Men
 CT versus CC 9 1,257/1,436§ 1,081/1,199§ 1.12 0.94–1.34 χ² = 18.68, df = 8 (P = 0.02) 57
 TT versus CC 9 1,257/1,436§ 271/346§ 0.87 0.74–1.02 χ² = 8.36, df = 8 (P = 0.40) 4
Women
 CT versus CC 8 755/897§ 627/773§ 0.98 0.85–1.12 χ² = 7.63, df = 7 (P = 0.37) 8
 TT versus CC 8 755/897§ 162/217§ 0.92 0.65–1.31 χ² = 20.74, df = 7 (P = 0.004) 66

Subgroup by cancer type

Pooled studies
 CT versus CC 27 3,735/6,767 3,403/6,307 1.01 0.95–1.08 χ² = 23.65, df = 26 (P = 0.60) 0
 TT versus CC 24* 3,735/6,767 886/2,117 0.80 0.71–0.89 χ² = 31.45, df = 23 (P = 0.11) 27
Colon cancer studies
 CT versus CC 16 2,096/4,463 1,933/4,090 1.01 0.93–1.10 χ² = 11.23, df = 15 (P = 0.74) 0
 TT versus CC 14** 2,096/4,463 452/1,352 0.76 0.64–0.91 χ² = 22.79, df = 13 (P = 0.04) 43
Rectal cancer studies
 CT versus CC 11 1,639/3,291 1,470/2,996 1.10 0.92–1.31 χ² = 27.95, df = 10 (P = 0.002) 64
 TT versus CC 10 1,639/3,291 386/1,020 0.82 0.72–0.94 χ² = 8.38, df = 9 (P = 0.50) 0

Subgroup by location

Asian countries
 CT versus CC 22 2,640/3,401 2,985/3,903 0.98 0.89–1.06 χ² = 23.98, df = 21 (P = 0.29) 12
 TT versus CC 20** 2,640/3,401 1,001/1,565 0.83 0.69–1.01 χ² = 49.66, df = 19 (P = 0.0001) 62
European countries
 CT versus CC 22 5,480/6,960 5,374/6,857 1.00 0.87–1.13 χ² = 109.92, df = 21 (P < 0.00001) 81
 TT versus CC 22 5,480/6,960 1,294/1,793 0.92 0.80–1.06 χ² = 43.74, df = 21 (P = 0.003) 52
USA
 CT versus CC 8 2,011/3,355 1,932/2,997 0.98 0.90–1.07 χ² = 6.07, df = 7 (P = 0.53) 0
 TT versus CC 8 2,011/3,355 436/1,055 0.73 0.63–0.84 χ² = 1.91, df = 7 (P = 0.96) 0
Middle Eastern countries
 CT versus CC 5 277/374 274/302 1.46 0.62–3.46 χ² = 45.30, df = 4 (P < 0.00001) 91
 TT versus CC 5 277/374 72/105 0.69 0.42–1.13 χ² = 5.56, df = 4 (P = 0.23) 28

Subgroup by control

Healthy person controls
 CT versus CC 45 8,706/12,958 8,043/12,044 1.02 0.94–1.11 χ² = 154.26, df = 44 (P < 0.00001) 71
 TT versus CC 43** 8,706/12,958 2,136/3,636 0.90 0.81–1.00 χ² = 88.37, df = 42 (P = 0.0001) 52
Hospital patient controls
 CT versus CC 16 2,418/2,863 2,932/3,619 0.93 0.83–1.05 χ² = 27.35, df = 15 (P = 0.03) 45
 TT versus CC 16 2,418/2,863 939/1,254 0.82 0.68–1.00 χ² = 36.07, df = 15 (P = 0.002) 58

§Not all studies reported both case and control numbers.

*There were two studies without TT genotype information, one study with rectal cancer data, and two studies with colon cancer data.

**There were two studies that had 0 people for the TT genotype.

CRC: colorectal cancer.