Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1136–e1145. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0243

TABLE 6.

HLM Results Examining the Effect of SWPBIS on Office Discipline Referrals and Suspensions

Predictor Variables Received Office Discipline Referral Received Out-of-School Suspension
AOR CI AOR CI
Student-level variables
 Grade cohort 0.67*** (0.57–0.79) 0.73** (0.59–0.91)
 Gender 3.58*** (3.21–4.00) 4.69*** (4.04–5.44)
 Ethnicity (black) 2.09*** (1.80–2.42) 2.56*** (2.18–3.01)
 Special ed 1.59*** (1.39–1.81) 2.09*** (1.82–2.41)
 FARMS 1.68*** (1.52–1.86) 1.61*** (1.38–1.88)
School-level variables
 SWPBIS intervention 0.66** (0.49–0.89) 0.97 (0.69–1.36)
 Student mobility 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 1.02 (0.99–1.04)
 Student/teacher ratio 0.99 (0.97–1.03) 1.02 (0.99–1.05)
 Enrollment 0.87*** (0.82–0.93) 1.04 (0.92–1.17)
 Faculty turnover 1.02 (0.99–1.04) 1.02 (0.99–1.05)
Post hoc cross-level interactions
 Grade cohort × SWPBIS .78 (0.57–1.08) 0.72 (0.47–1.10)
 Gender × SWPBIS 1.27* (1.04–1.56) 1.29 (0.97–1.73)
 Special ed status × SWPBIS 0.96 (0.75–1.24) 1.34 (0.99–1.79)

SWPBIS was coded 1 (intervention), 0 (comparison). FARMS indicates free or reduced-price meals status. Gender was coded 1 (male), 0 (female). Ethnicity was coded 1(Black), 0 (all others). Grade cohort indicates the grade the youth was in when the trial began, coded 1 (kindergarten), 0 (grades 1 or 2). CI = 95% confidence interval. Ed, education. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001.