Skip to main content
. 2012 May;102(5):979–987. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300558

TABLE 3—

Implicit General Race Bias and Race and Medical Compliance Stereotyping as Predictors of Patient–Clinician Communication by Patient Race: The Race and Relationship-Centered Care Study, Baltimore, MD, January 2002–August 2006

Implicit General Race Bias, Black Patients (n = 131)a
Implicit General Race Bias, White Patients (n = 48)
Implicit Race and Medical Compliance Stereotyping, Black Patients (n = 135)a
Implicit Race and Medical Compliance Stereotyping, White Patients (n = 48)
Communication Behavior Mean Estimateb (95% CI) P Mean Estimateb (95% CI) P Mean Estimateb (95% CI) P Mean Estimateb (95% CI) P
Verbal dominance ratio .05 .01 .14 .02
 No implicit bias 1.47 (1.29, 1.66) 1.27 (1.09, 1.49) 1.48 (1.28, 1.71) 1.56 (1.26, 1.94)
 Implicit bias 9% (0, 19) 11% (2, 21) 10% (−3, 24) −25% (−42, −4)
Visit length, minutes .36 .14 .02 .001
 No implicit bias 14.0 (11.7, 16.7) 17.1 (14.6, 19.9) 13.3 (11.2, 15.7) 19.5 (16.0, 23.8)
 Implicit bias 7% (−7, 22) 8% (−17, 3) 20% (3, 40) −21% (−31, –9)
Speech speed, statements per minute .23 .83 .02 .001
 No implicit bias 25.5 (24.1, 26.9) 23.7 (21.6, 25.8) 25.8 (24.6, 27.0) 21.6 (19.4, 23.8)
 Implicit bias –0.76 (−2.02, 0.50) 0.25 (−2.05, 2.55) –1.75 (−3.25, −0.25) 3.9 (1.6, 6.3)
Patient centeredness ratio .63 .37 .06 .02
 No implicit bias 1.66 (0.95, 2.37) 0.70 (0.58, 0.82) 1.97 (1.00, 2.94) 0.60 (0.45, 0.74)
 Implicit bias –0.10 (−0.51, 0.31) –0.05 (−0.17, 0.07) –0.93 (−1.91, 0.04) 0.15 (0.02, 0.28)
Clinician positive affect .14 .78 .35 .02
 No implicit bias 3.63 (3.51, 3.75) 3.38 (3.31, 3.45) 3.60 (3.49, 3.72) 3.30 (3.20, 3.40)
 Implicit bias –0.10 (−0.23, 0.03) –0.01 (−0.07, 0.05) –0.06 (−0.19, 0.07) 0.12 (0.02, 0.21)
Patient positive affect .04 .87 .53 .09
 No implicit bias 3.39 (3.30, 3.49) 3.31 (3.19, 3.43) 3.36 (3.26, 3.45) 3.24 (3.10, 3.38)
 Implicit bias –0.10 (−0.19, –0.00) 0.01 (−0.09, 0.10) –0.04 (−0.16, 0.08) 0.11 (−0.02, 0.24)

Note. CI = confidence interval. Adjusted for clinician gender and patient age, gender, education, and the mental component of the Medical Outcomes Short Form 12.

a

We excluded 1 observation from speech speed and 1 from patient centeredness because they were extreme outliers.

b

We estimated the means while holding all other covariates at their means. The estimate for “no pro-White bias” for verbal dominance and visit length is the geometric mean from the generalized estimating equations (GEE) model for a bias score of zero; the estimate for “implicit bias” is the percentage change in verbal dominance and visit length associated with a 0.5-point increase in the bias score. For all other variables, the estimate for “no implicit bias” is the mean outcome score from the GEE model for a bias score of zero; the estimate for “implicit bias” is the change in the outcome associated with a change in bias score of 0.5 (considered a moderate level of bias).