Skip to main content
. 1998 Oct;118(2):661–674. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.2.661

Table I.

Comparison of predicted amino acids from various GKs, GPRs, and P5CSs

Namea tomPRO1 tomPRO2
%
tomPRO2 35 /57b 100
Arabid 34 /56 76 /87
ArabidB 34 /56 76 /88
Vigna 32 /54 76 /88
Medicago 33 /56 77 /87
Rice 34 /55 76 /85
Homos 34 /56 48 /66
Cele 32 /56 47 /66
Yeast 37 /59 39 /59
Coryne 40 /61 34 /57
Bacsub 39 /56 35 /56
Tthermo 39 /61 35 /56
Trepone 41 /60 35 /55
Haein 39 /60 37 /59
Serma 40 /60 38 /59
Ecoli 40 /61 39 /60
Synecho 41 /62 44 /62
Strept 47 /65 37 /59
tomPRO1 100 35 /57
a

Comparison was done by the GAP program of the GCG. Abbreviations and accession numbers for these proteins are as in Methods

b

Each number is depicted as identity/similarity.