Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 4;22(4):462–477. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z

Table 6.

Intervention characteristics

Study Timing of intervention, early intervention: starts within 6 weeks of absence Care professionals involved, multidisciplinary Planning of activities to support RTW, time contingency, activities followed time schedule Target population Character of activities to support RTW, explicit actions to stimulate RTWa Intensityb Employee and employer role, decision authority
Brouwers et al. [11] No/no restrictiction No Yes Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Moderate Yes
van der Feldtz-Cornelis et al. [12] No/no restrictiction Yes No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Mortelmans et al. [13] No/no restrictiction Yes No Generic: all absent employees

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Bogefeldt et al. [18] No/no restrictiction Yes No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Bültmann et al. [20] No/no restrictiction Yes No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: yes

High Yes
Fleten and Johnsen [24] No/no restrictiction No Yes Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable Yes
van der Klink et al. [16] Yes Yes Yes Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

High/moderate Yes
Arnetz et al. [19] No/no restrictiction Yes No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: yes

Low or variable No
Bakker et al. [29] No/no restrictiction No No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

High Yes
Drews et al. [32] No/no restrictiction No No Generic: all absent employees

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable Yes
Hagen et al. [30] No/no restrictiction Uncertain No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

High No
Nystuen and Hagen [31] No/no restrictiction No No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

High Yes
Braathen et al. [25] No/no restrictiction Yes Yes Generic: all absent employees

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

High Yes
Marhold et al. [23] No/no restrictiction No Yes Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: yes

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

High No
Grossi and Santell [22] No/no restrictiction Yes Yes Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

High Yes
Godges et al. [26] No/no restrictiction No No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Matheson and Brophy [21] No/no restrictiction Yes Yes Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: yes

Gradual exposure: yes

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Weiler et al. [15] No/no restrictiction Yes Yes Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: yes

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: yes

High No
van Oostrom et al. [14] No/no restrictiction Yes No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: yes

Gradual exposure: yes

Work-related adaptations: yes

Low or variable No
Carroll et al. [17] Yes Yes No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: yes

Gradual exposure: yes

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Meijer et al. [7] No/no restrictiction Uncertain No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Norlund et al. [27] No/no restrictiction Uncertain No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No
Tveito et al. [28] No/no restrictiction Uncertain No Specific diagnosis

Decision RTW: no

Gradual exposure: no

Work-related adaptations: no

Low or variable No

RTW return to work

Criteria and sub criteria of a characteristic (for example A, B) are in line with the criteria for evaluating the composition of the included interventions (Table 3)

Studies are listed in order of methodological quality

aThree types of actions to stimulate the employee to return to work, which are: making a decision about actual return to work (when and/or how it takes place), gradual exposure to the workplace (for example when employees resume work for a limited but increasing number of hours per week) and implemented work-related adaptations, e.g. workplace (such as ergonomic improvements of furniture)

bHigh: ≥10 h, more than 1 session/moderate: <10 h, more than 1 session/low: once or variable