Table 6.
Empty model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | S.E. | Estimate | S.E. | Estimate | S.E. | Estimate | S.E. | Estimate | S.E. | |
Intercept | 34.61*** | 0.72 | 34.47*** | 1.40 | 33.47*** | 0.81 | 32.75*** | 1.24 | 33.00*** | 0.92 |
Disability | -1.69 [-4.60, 1.21] | 1.46 | ||||||||
Illness onset | -1.44 [-4.03, 1.13] | 1.30 | ||||||||
Illness course | 0.46 [-2.12, 3.03] | 1.29 | ||||||||
Illness outcome | 0.23 [-2.02, 2.47] | 1.13 | ||||||||
Parental depression | 1.17 [-0.31, 2.65] | 0.74 | 1.11 [-38, 2.61] | 0.75 | 1.08 [-0.44, 2.59] | 0.76 | 1.11 [-38, 2.61] | 0.75 | ||
Quality of marital relationship | 1.24 [-0.32, 2.80] | 0.78 | 1.25 [-0.32, 2.82] | 0.79 | 1.25 [-0.21, 2.83] | 0.79 | 1.25 [-0.32, 2.82] | 0.79 | ||
Quality of parent-child interaction | -1.38* [-2.62, -0.14] | 0.62 | -1.44* [-2.70, -0.19] | 0.63 | -1.48* [-2.76, -0.20] | 0.64 | -1.44 [-2.69, -0.19] | 0.63 | ||
Quality of parent attachment | -3.97*** [-5.13, -2.80] | 0.59 | -3.97*** [-5.13, -2.79] | 0.59 | -3.96*** [-5.13, -2.79] | 0.59 | -3.97*** [-5.13, -2.79] | 0.59 | ||
Adolescents’ gender | 3.13** [1.27, 5.16] | 1.03 | 3.06** [1.03, 5.11] | 1.03 | 3.08** [1.51, 5.42] | 1.03 | 3.06** [1.03, 5.11] | 1.03 | ||
Adolescents’ age | 0.94 [-0.12, 2.00] | 0.54 | 0.93 [-0.13, 2.00] | 0.54 | 0.95* [-0.12, 2.03] | 0.54 | 0.93 [-0.13, 2.00] | 0.54 | ||
Level 1 variance | 46.07 | 34.94 | 34.73 | 34.84 | 34.92 | |||||
Level 2 variance | 19.86 | 6.35 | 6.62 | 6.86 | 6.78 | |||||
AIC | 1105.74 | 1021.50 | 1021.83 | 1022.97 | 1023.33 | |||||
Explained variance (Level 1) | 37.4 % | 37.3 % | 36.8 % | 36.8 % | ||||||
Explained variance (Level 2) | 43.4 % | 44.7 % | 43.4 % | 43.5 % |
AIC Akaike Information Criterion. Explained variance at Level 2 was calculated assuming that families have two children on average.*p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001