Table 1.
(2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) CR internalizing | .34*** | .46*** | .13* | −.04 | .01 | −.09 | .26*** | .11 | .08 | .03 | .02 | .06 |
(2) MR internalizing | .21** | .63*** | −.13 | −.14* | −.02 | .10 | .38*** | −.14* | −.06 | −.17* | .07 | |
(3) CR externalizing | .32*** | −.22*** | −.09 | −.15* | .38*** | .17* | .22** | −.24*** | −.18** | −.08 | ||
(4) MR externalizing | −.12 | −.22** | −.05 | .15* | .53*** | −.19** | .13 | −.21** | .03 | |||
(5) CR positive relationship quality | .23** | .81*** | −.36*** | −.07 | −.25*** | .71*** | .30*** | .50*** | ||||
(6) MR positive relationship Quality | −.39*** | −.19** | −.16* | −.05 | .25*** | .50*** | −.10 | |||||
(7) positive relationship quality Discrepancy | −.21** | .04 | −.21** | .54** | −.02 | .54*** | ||||||
(8) CR negative relationship Quality | .17* | .77*** | −.35*** | −.09 | −.25*** | |||||||
(9) MR negative relationship quality | −.49*** | −.02 | −.15* | .08 | ||||||||
(10) Negative relationship quality Discrepancy | −.29*** | .01 | −.28*** | |||||||||
(11) CR youth self-disclosure | .38*** | −.71*** | ||||||||||
(12) MR self- disclosure | −.38** | |||||||||||
(13) Self- disclosure d0069screpancy |
CR child-report, MR mother-report
p <.05;
p <.01;
p <.001