Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2012 May 10;41(9):1151–1167. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9773-8

Table 1.

Correlations between self- and mother-reported internalizing adjustment, externalizing adjustment, positive relationship quality, negative relationship quality, balanced cohesion, balanced flexibility, and self-disclosure

(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
(1) CR internalizing .34*** .46*** .13* −.04 .01 −.09 .26*** .11 .08 .03 .02 .06
(2) MR internalizing .21** .63*** −.13 −.14* −.02 .10 .38*** −.14* −.06 −.17* .07
(3) CR externalizing .32*** −.22*** −.09 −.15* .38*** .17* .22** −.24*** −.18** −.08
(4) MR externalizing −.12 −.22** −.05 .15* .53*** −.19** .13 −.21** .03
(5) CR positive relationship quality .23** .81*** −.36*** −.07 −.25*** .71*** .30*** .50***
(6) MR positive relationship Quality −.39*** −.19** −.16* −.05 .25*** .50*** −.10
(7) positive relationship quality Discrepancy −.21** .04 −.21** .54** −.02 .54***
(8) CR negative relationship Quality .17* .77*** −.35*** −.09 −.25***
(9) MR negative relationship quality −.49*** −.02 −.15* .08
(10) Negative relationship quality Discrepancy −.29*** .01 −.28***
(11) CR youth self-disclosure .38*** −.71***
(12) MR self- disclosure −.38**
(13) Self- disclosure d0069screpancy

CR child-report, MR mother-report

*

p <.05;

**

p <.01;

***

p <.001