. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2012 May 10;41(9):1151–1167. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9773-8

Table 2.

Summary of the hierarchical regression analyses examining relations between self- and mother-reported positive relationship quality with self- and mother-reported internalizing and externalizing adjustment

Predictor variables	Self-reported adjustment					Mother-reported adjustment
Predictor variables	B	SE B	β	R²	ΔR²	B	SE B	β	R²	ΔR²
Internalizing adjustment
Step1				.10					.02
Grade	−.02	.01	−.16^*			−.01	.01	−.10
Gender	−.15	.04	−.27^***			−.04	.03	−.11
Step2				.13	.03				.08	.05
CR positive relationship quality	−.07	.03	−.19^**			−.04	.02	−.15^*
MR positive relationship quality	.01	.04	.02			−.06	.03	−.15^*
Step 3				.14	.01				.08	.00
CR by MR interaction term	.08	.05	.10			−.01	.04	−.01
Externalizing adjustment
Step 1				.05					.06
Grade	.00	.01	.04			−.03	.01	−.23^**
Gender	.11	.04	.22^**			.03	.04	.06
Step 2				.08	.03				.16	.10
CR positive relationship quality	−.06	.02	−.17^*			−.03	.02	−.09
MR positive relationship quality	−.03	.04	−.06			−.16	.04	−.29^***
Step 3				.09	.00				.17	.01
CR by MR interaction term	.05	.05	.06			.08	.05	.10

CR child-report, MR mother-report

p <.05,

^**

p <.01,

^***

p <.001