. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2012 May 10;41(9):1151–1167. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9773-8

Table 3.

Summary of the hierarchical regression analyses examining relations between self- and mother-reported negative relationship quality with self- and mother-reported internalizing and externalizing adjustment

Predictor variables	Self-reported adjustment					Mother-reported adjustment
Predictor variables	B	SE B	β	R²	ΔR²	B	SE B	β	R²	ΔR²
Internalizing adjustment
Step 1				.10					.03
Grade	−.02	.01	−.15^*			−.01	.01	−.11
Gender	−.15	.04	−.26^***			−.04	.03	−.12
Step 2				.15	.05				.15	.12
CR negative relationship quality	.08	.02	.21^**			.02	.02	.07
MR negative relationship quality	.03	.03	.06			.11	.02	.34^***
Step 3				.16	.01				.16	.01
CR by MR interaction term	.06	.04	.11			.04	.02	.12
Externalizing adjustment
Step 1				.05					.06
Grade	.01	.01	.05			−.03	.01	−.24^***
Gender	.12	.04	.22^**			.03	.04	.06
Step 2				.20	.15				.33	.27
CR negative relationship quality	.12	.02	.35^***			.04	.02	.11^*
MR negative relationship quality	.06	.03	.13^*			.24	.03	.49^***
Step 3				.20	.00				.33	.00
CR by MR interaction term	−.01	.03	−.02			.01	.03	.02

CR child-report, MR mother-report

p <.05;

^**

p <.01;

^***

p <.001