Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2012 May 10;41(9):1151–1167. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9773-8

Table 4.

Summary of the hierarchical regression analyses examining relations between self- and mother-reported youth self-disclosure with self-and mother-reported internalizing and externalizing adjustment

Predictor variables Self-reported adjustment
Mother-reported adjustment
B SE B β R2 ΔR2 B SE B β R2 ΔR2
Internalizing adjustment
Step 1 .09 .03
 Grade −.02 .01 −.15 −.01 .01 −.12
 Gender −.15 .04 −.26** −.04 .03 −.11
Step 2 .10 .00 .08 .05
 CR youth self-disclosure −.01 .02 −.03 −.01 .01 −.07
 MR youth self-disclosure −.01 .02 −.04 −.04 .02 −.19**
Step 3 .10 .00 .08 .06
 CR by MR interaction term −.02 .02 −.05 −.01 .01 −.05
Externalizing adjustment
Step 1 .04 .07
 Grade .00 .01 .04 −.03 .01 −.25***
 Gender .12 .04 .20** .03 .04 .06
Step 2 .09 .04 .12 .06
 CR youth self-disclosure −.04 .02 −.15* −.03 .02 −.11
 MR youth self-disclosure −.04 .02 −.12 −.06 .02 −.19**
Step 3 .09 .01 .13 .00
 CR by MR interaction term −.03 .02 −.09 −.02 .02 −.05

CR child-report, MR mother-report

*

p <.05;

**

p <.01;

***

p <.001