. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2012 May 10;41(9):1151–1167. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9773-8

Table 6.

Hierarchical regression analyses examining relations between self- and mother-reported negative relationship quality discrepancy scores with self- and mother-reported Internalizing and externalizing adjustment

Predictor variables	Self-reported adjustment					Mother-reported adjustment
Predictor variables	B	SE B	β	R²	Δ R²	B	SE B	β	R²	Δ R²
Internalizing adjustment
Step 1				.10					.03
Grade	−.02	.01	−.16^*			−.01	.01	−.11
Gender	−.15	.04	−.26^***			−.04	.03	−.12
Step 2				.11	.02				.04	.01
NRQ discrepancy	.04	.02	.13^*			−.03	.02	−.12
Step 3				.11	.00				.04	.00
Squared NRQ discrepancy	−.01	.02	−.07			.00	.01	.01
Externalizing adjustment
Step 1				.05					.06	.06
Grade	.01	.01	.05			−.03	.01	−.24^***
Gender	.12	.04	.22^**			.03	.04	.06
Step 2				.09	.04				.08	.03
NRQ discrepancy	.06	.02	.20^**			−.05	.02	−.16^*
Step 3				.10	.01
Squared NRQ discrepancy	.02	.02	.13			.04	.02	.24^*	.11	.03

NRQ negative relationship quality

p <.05;

^**

p <.01;

^***

p <.001