Table 8.
Hierarchical regression analyses examining relations between the absolute value discrepancy scores for positive relationship quality discrepancy, negative relationship quality discrepancy, and youth self-disclosure with self- and mother-reported internalizing and externalizing adjustment
| Predictor variables | Self-reported adjustment
|
Mother-reported adjustment
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE B | β | R2 | ΔR2 | B | SE B | β | R2 | ΔR2 | |
| Internalizing adjustment | ||||||||||
| Step 1 | .10 | .02 | ||||||||
| Grade | −.02 | .01 | −.16* | −.01 | .01 | −.10 | ||||
| Gender | −.15 | .04 | −.27*** | −.04 | .03 | −.11 | ||||
| Step 2a | .10 | .00 | .02 | .00 | ||||||
| Absolute PRQ discrepancy | .01 | .03 | .02 | .01 | .02 | .04 | ||||
| Step 2 | .10 | .00 | .04 | .02 | ||||||
| Absolute NRQ discrepancy | .01 | .03 | .03 | −.04 | .02 | −.13 | ||||
| Step 2 | .09 | .00 | .03 | .00 | ||||||
| Absolute SDQ discrepancy | .02 | .03 | .04 | .02 | .02 | .06 | ||||
| Externalizing adjustment | ||||||||||
| Step 1 | .05 | .06 | ||||||||
| Grade | .01 | .01 | .04 | −.03 | .01 | −.23** | ||||
| Gender | .11 | .04 | .21** | .03 | .04 | .06 | ||||
| Step 2 | .06 | .01 | .06 | .00 | ||||||
| Absolute PRQ discrepancy | .06 | .03 | .12 | .00 | .03 | .00 | ||||
| Step 2 | .07 | .02 | .06 | .00 | ||||||
| Absolute NRQ discrepancy | .06 | .03 | .15* | −.01 | .03 | −.02 | ||||
| Step 2 | .08 | .04 | .08 | .02 | ||||||
| Absolute SD discrepancy | .08 | .03 | .20** | .06 | .03 | .16* | ||||
PRQ positive relationship quality, NRQ negative relationship quality, SD self-disclosure
*
p <.05;
**
p <.01;
***
p <.001
a
Separate hierarchical regressions were conducted for the absolute-value positive relationship quality discrepancy score, the absolute-value negative relationship quality discrepancy score, and the absolute-value self-disclosure discrepancy score