Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 24;64(4):397–413. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-24

Table 6.

Summary of Findings for Sensitivity Analyses Testing Validity of Assumptions

UL motor capacity UL ability Comprehensive function
Acuity of participants
 ≥6 mo post event 7 trials
n=270
SMD=0.52
95% CI, 0.27–0.77
6 trials
n=180
SMD=0.74
95% CI, 0.43–1.04
4 trials
n=134
SMD=0.59
95% CI, 0.24–0.93
 <6 mo post event 5 trials
n=74
SMD=0.93
95% CI, 0.41–1.45
8 trials
n=150
SMD=1.00
95% CI, 0.65–1.36
2 trials
n=63
SMD=0.61
95% CI, 0.10–1.12
Test for sub-group difference χ2=1.96; p=0.16 χ2=1.21; p=0.27 χ2=0.01; p=0.94
Total weeks of CIMT regimen
 10 4 trials
n=43
SMD=0.69
95% CI, 0.01–1.38
4 trials
n=43
SMD=1.18
95% CI, 0.46–1.89
Unable to analyze
 2 or 3 12 trials
n=411
SMD=0.39
95% CI, 0.19–0.59
7 trials
n=235
SMD=0.92
95% CI, 0.65–1.19
Test for sub-group difference χ2=0.71; p=0.40 χ2=0.44; p=0.51

UL=upper limb; SMD=standardized mean difference; CIMT=constraint-induced movement therapy.