Table 2.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the 12 general opinion and payment issues questionnaire statements
| Statement #a | n |
Factor |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Gender | Background | Position | Affiliation | Employment | ||
|
1 |
243 |
1.00 (0.96;1.04) |
1.27 (0.41;3.94) |
0.32 (0.16;0.66) c |
2.18 (0.84;5.66) |
0.91 (0.49;1.70) |
0.87 (0.41;1.84) |
|
2b |
232 |
1.03 (0.99;1.08) |
2.60 (0.53;12.71) |
1.35 (0.65;2.82) |
439.82 c,d (23.6;8211.3) |
1.53 (0.72;3.25) |
0.99 (0.44;2.20) |
|
3 |
198 |
1.01 (0.97;1.05) |
1.86 (0.53;6.48) |
0.76 (0.40;1.45) |
2.38 (0.85;6.63) |
1.27 (0.68;2.40) |
0.92 (0.43;1.97) |
|
4 |
241 |
0.99 (0.93;1.05) |
1.81 (0.22;15.18) |
0.65 (0.26;1.65) |
0.92 (0.20;4.14) |
0.50 (0.19;1.35) |
0.54 (0.17;1.65) |
|
5 |
226 |
1.02 (0.97;1.08) |
2.56 (0.74;8.89) |
0.40 (0.14;1.12) |
1.85 (0.52;6.57) |
1.07 (0.44;2.56) |
1.98 (0.68;5.73) |
|
6 |
238 |
1.00 (0.96;1.03) |
1.65 (0.54;5.02) |
1.75 (0.95;3.20) |
0.88 (0.35;2.20) |
0.62 (0.35;1.12) |
0.57 (0.29;1.13) |
|
7 |
238 |
1.01 (0.96;1.06) |
0.93 (0.23;3.67) |
0.81 (0.37;1.78) |
0.51 (0.15;1.80) |
0.52 (0.23;1.14) |
1.27 (0.47;3.47) |
|
8b |
201 |
1.01 (0.97;1.05) |
10.31 (0.59;178.94) |
0.90 (0.45;1.81) |
1.24 (0.39;3.96) |
1.60 (0.81;3.16) |
1.34 (0.60;2.98) |
|
9 |
238 |
0.96 (0.92;1.00) |
1.78 (0.58;5.46) |
0.89 (0.44;1.81) |
0.59 (0.20;1.67) |
0.93 (0.47;1.82) |
0.79 (0.35;1.78) |
|
10 |
233 |
0.98 (0.91;1.06) |
0.93 (0.10;8.41) |
1.12 (0.33;3.80) |
1.84 (0.28;12.20) |
0.35 (0.10;1.28) |
0.30 (0.08;1.17) |
|
11 |
240 |
1.02 (0.98;1.06) |
2.79 (0.74;10.57) |
0.53 (0.29;0.97) |
0.92 (0.35;2.42) |
0.84 (0.46;1.54) |
1.07 (0.53;2.18) |
| 12 | 241 | 0.97 (0.92;1.03) | 1.14 (0.13;9.89) | 1.01 (0.37;2.77) | 1.06 (0.19;5.81) | 1.25 (0.46;3.40) | 0.89 (0.29;2.70) |
The tabulated numbers are odds ratios with their 95 % confidence intervals (in parentheses).
a See Appendix 1 for details of the questionnaire statements.
b Logistic regression estimation based on Firth’s penalised likelihood.
c Significant odds ratio at p = 0.05.
d Though the effect is huge because 100 % of the residents agreed to this statement, the ‘position’ perfectly predicts agreement to statement 2.