Table 3.
Comparison of mean weekly recruitment (expressed for each month) at intervention, pre-existing and control sessions
| Recruitment to fit and fab sessions mean (SD) | Recruitment to pre-existing sessions mean (SD) | Recruitment to control area sessions mean (SD) | F- values | Df | p values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 2010 |
na |
.86 (1.10) |
1.28 (1.46) |
F = 1.636 |
1 |
.206 |
| Oct 2010 |
18.13 (12.30) a, b |
1.04 (.42) a |
.30 (.41) b |
F = 10.547 |
2 |
.003 |
| Nov 2010 |
2.25 (1.68) |
.78 (.41) |
.31 (.38) |
F = 3.908 |
2 |
.060 |
| Dec 2010 |
1.00 (.35) |
.78 (.61) |
.08 (.14) |
F = 3.493 |
2 |
.089 |
| Jan 2011 |
3.53 (3.03) |
1.29 (.43) |
.38 (.595) |
F = 3.527 |
2 |
.080 |
| Feb 2011 |
3.45 (.81) a, b |
.84 (.26) a |
.25 (.50) b |
F = 35.972 |
2 |
<.001 |
| Mar 2011 | 5.60 (1.69)a, b | .65 (.25) a | .25 (.29) b | F = 39.100 | 2 | .001 |
Superscripts (a, b, c) indicate mean difference in Bonferroni comparisons (p < 0.05).
a = Fit and Fab v pre-existing sessions, b = Fit and Fab v control area sessions, c = pre-existing sessions v control area sessions.