Table 5.
Comparison of mean weekly recruitment (expressed for each month) between different types of intervention sessions
| Gym session mean (SD) | Line dancing mean (SD) | Body tone mean (SD) | Zumba mean (SD) | Salsa mean (SD) | F- values | df | p values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2010 |
15.00 (14.93) |
19.0 (17.35) |
14.5 (15.09) |
19.75 (10.15) |
14.75 (9.47) |
F = .135 |
4 |
.970 |
| Nov 2010 |
1.40 (1.14) |
1.20 (2.68) |
2.25(2.22) |
3.25 (2.99) |
2.75 (1.50) |
F = .701 |
4 |
.602 |
| Dec 2010 |
.50 (.71) |
1.00 (1.41) |
1.00 (1.00) |
1.00 (1.00) |
1.67 (.577) |
F = .490 |
4 |
.744 |
| Jan 2011 |
4.00 (2.94) |
1.67 (1.16) |
3.33 (4.16) |
5.33 (6.66) |
3.00 (2.65) |
F = .364 |
4 |
.829 |
| Feb 2011 |
1.50 (1.00) c |
2.00 (1.83) f |
1.75 (.96) h |
7.50 (1.73) c, f, h, j |
4.00 (1.41) j |
F = 12.415 |
4 |
<.001 |
| Mar 2011 | 5.00 (2.16) c | 1.80 (2.49) f | 2.60 (2.30) h | 13.40 (5.94) c, f, h, j | 6.00 (3.74) j | F = 7.808 | 4 | .001 |
Superscripts (a-j) indicate mean difference in Bonferroni comparisons (p < 0.05).
a = Gym v Line Dancing, b = Gym v Body Tone, c = Gym v Zumba, d = Gym v Salsa, e = Line Dancing v Body Tone, f = Line Dancing v Zumba,
g = Line Dancing v Salsa, h = Body Tone v Zumba, i = Body Tone v Salsa, j = Zumba v Salsa.