Table 6.
Comparison of mean weekly attendance (expressed for each month) between different types of intervention sessions
Gym session mean (SD) | Line dancing mean (SD) | Body tone mean (SD) | Zumba mean (SD) | Salsa mean (SD) | F- values | df | p values | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 2010 |
26.67 (5.51) c |
37.33 (1.53) |
28.25 (7.93) h |
42.50 (6.76) c, h |
33.50 (3.87) |
F = 4.594 |
4 |
.016 |
Nov 2010 |
16.20 (3.90) c |
19.40 (7.57) |
18.00 (3.92) |
31.50 (11.12) c |
24.00 (2.45) |
F = 3.731 |
4 |
.023 |
Dec 2010 |
8.00 (1.41) |
9.5 (3.54) |
6.00 (1.00) h |
14.00 (0.00) h |
10.67 (2.31) |
F = 7.740 |
4 |
.007 |
Jan 2011 |
17.25 (3.86) |
14.33 (2.08) f |
13.67 (3.51) h |
23.33 (2.31) f, h |
21.67 (2.52) |
F = 6.090 |
4 |
.008 |
Feb 2011 |
14.75 (3.54) c,d |
18.50 (1.73) f |
12.50 (3.32) h,i |
34.00 (2.00) c, f, h |
25.25 (2.63) d,i |
F = 20.263 |
4 |
<.001 |
Mar 2011 | 19.00 (2.71) c,d | 21.00 (2.55) f,g | 17.20 (2.39) h,i | 48.80 (7.26) c, f, h | 40.00 (5.15) d,g, i | F = 48.677 | 4 | <.001 |
Superscripts (a-j) indicate mean difference in Bonferroni comparisons (p < 0.05).
a = Gym v Line Dancing, b = Gym v Body Tone, c = Gym v Zumba, d = Gym v Salsa, e = Line Dancing v Body Tone, f = Line Dancing v Zumba,
g = Line Dancing v Salsa, h = Body Tone v Zumba, i = Body Tone v Salsa, j = Zumba v Salsa.