Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 2;12:836. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-836

Table 6.

Comparison of mean weekly attendance (expressed for each month) between different types of intervention sessions

  Gym session mean (SD) Line dancing mean (SD) Body tone mean (SD) Zumba mean (SD) Salsa mean (SD) F- values df p values
Oct 2010
26.67 (5.51) c
37.33 (1.53)
28.25 (7.93) h
42.50 (6.76) c, h
33.50 (3.87)
F = 4.594
4
.016
Nov 2010
16.20 (3.90) c
19.40 (7.57)
18.00 (3.92)
31.50 (11.12) c
24.00 (2.45)
F = 3.731
4
.023
Dec 2010
8.00 (1.41)
9.5 (3.54)
6.00 (1.00) h
14.00 (0.00) h
10.67 (2.31)
F = 7.740
4
.007
Jan 2011
17.25 (3.86)
14.33 (2.08) f
13.67 (3.51) h
23.33 (2.31) f, h
21.67 (2.52)
F = 6.090
4
.008
Feb 2011
14.75 (3.54) c,d
18.50 (1.73) f
12.50 (3.32) h,i
34.00 (2.00) c, f, h
25.25 (2.63) d,i
F = 20.263
4
<.001
Mar 2011 19.00 (2.71) c,d 21.00 (2.55) f,g 17.20 (2.39) h,i 48.80 (7.26) c, f, h 40.00 (5.15) d,g, i F = 48.677 4 <.001

Superscripts (a-j) indicate mean difference in Bonferroni comparisons (p < 0.05).

a = Gym v Line Dancing, b = Gym v Body Tone, c = Gym v Zumba, d = Gym v Salsa, e = Line Dancing v Body Tone, f = Line Dancing v Zumba,

g = Line Dancing v Salsa, h = Body Tone v Zumba, i = Body Tone v Salsa, j = Zumba v Salsa.