Table 1. The identification and the numbers of bacterial clones obtained from the samples; the classification reliability is given by confidence threshold (ct) value (RDP Classifier, [23]).
Order | Family | Genus | ct % | start | XFa | TFa | XFc | TFc | XFv | TFv | XFp | TFp |
uncl. Acidobacteria_Gp2 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||
Actinomycetales | Brevibacteriaceae | Brevibacterium | 100 | 1 | ||||||||
Micrococcaceae | Kocuria | 93–100 | 2 | 10 | 1 | |||||||
Sphingobacteriales | uncl. Sphingobacteriales | 3 | ||||||||||
Bacteroidetes inc. sedis | Ohtaekwangia | 100 | 1 | |||||||||
Bacillales | Bacillaceae | Bacillus | 99–100 | 1 | 17 | |||||||
Lysinibacillus | 100 | 11 | 6 | |||||||||
Oceanobacillus | 100 | 5 | ||||||||||
uncl. Bacillaceae | 5 | |||||||||||
Virgibacillus | 81–89 | 7 | 12 | |||||||||
Staphylococcaceae | Staphylococcus | 98–100 | 5 | |||||||||
Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Lactococcus | 100 | 1 | ||||||||
Rhizobiales | Rhizobiaceae | Rhizobium | 100 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
uncl. Rhizobiales | 8 | 1 | ||||||||||
Alphaproteobacteria inc. sedis | Rhizomicrobium | 100 | 1 | |||||||||
Rhodospirillales | Acetobacteraceae | uncl. Acetobacteraceae | 2 | |||||||||
Burkholderiales | Comamonadaceae | Pelomonas | 100 | 2 | ||||||||
Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Pantoea | 99 | 1 | ||||||||
uncl. Enterobacteriaceae | 2 | |||||||||||
Pseudomonadales | Pseudomonadaceae | Pseudomonas | 84 | 1 | ||||||||
Xanthomonadales | Xanthomonadaceae | Stenotrophomonas | 100 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 2 | |||||
Myxococcales | uncl. Sorangiineae | 2 | ||||||||||
uncl. Deltaproteobacteria | 1 |
Legend: Start - samples from Tyrophagus putrescentiae originating from the rearing diet before the transfer to the fungal diets; X – samples form fungal cultures before mite introduction; T – samples from Tyrophagus putrescentiae on fungal diet sampled 7 days after the introduction; Fa -Fusarium avenaceum, Fc - F. culmorum, Fp - F. poae and Fv - F. verticillioides.