Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2012 Jul 25;162(1):42–49.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.040

Table 4.

Adjusted prenatal care coefficients in birth weight regression models for the Natality samples

Non-isolated clefts Isolated clefts No clefts

Regression
Coefficient
(Standard
Error)
P value Regression
Coefficient
(Standard
Error)
P value Regression
Coefficient
(Standard
Error)
P value
Gestational age not adjusted for in the regression as a covariate
   Model 1: Assuming a linear effect of prenatal visits
     Number of visits 50.58
(9.43)
< 0.0001 21.30
(3.73)
< 0.0001 16.32
(0.28)
< 0.0001

   Model 2: Assuming a non-linear effect of prenatal visits
     Number of visits 97.39
(23.94)
< 0.0001 53.91
(10.79)
< 0.0001 55.26
(0.683)
< 0.0001

     Number of visits squared −1.911
(0.899)
0.034 −1.313
(0.408)
0.001 −1.474
(0.0236)
< 0.0001

   Model 3: Using Kessner Index instead of prenatal visits (effects relative to adequate care)
     Inadequate prenatal care −89.62
(151.3)
0.554 −31.19
(66.98)
0.642 −94.29
(4.97)
< 0.0001

     Intermediate prenatal care −263.1
(104.1)
0.012 −118.3
(37.9)
0.002 −33.27
(2.90)
< 0.0001

Gestational age adjusted for in the regression as a covariate
   Model 1: Assuming a linear effect of prenatal visits
     Number of visits 16.77
(8.30)
0.044 8.00
(3.34)
0.017 4.59
(0.24)
< 0.0001

   Model 2: Assuming a non-linear effect of prenatal visits
     Number of visits 44.49 (20.50) 0.031 28.74
(9.575)
0.003 20.74
(0.577)
< 0.0001

     Number of visits squared −1.118
(0.756)
0.140 −0.831
(0.360)
0.021 −0.606
(0.0198)
< 0.0001

Note: Regression models included several socioeconomic, demographic, and maternal health covariates described in the Table II.