Table 6.
Comparisons between Chinese Spring cDNA transcripts and assembled transcripts
|
51,449 Chinese Spring (CS) ESTs |
Trinity |
Trans-ABySS |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFSFASSS | AFSF + ASSS | AF + SF + AS + SS | AFSFASSS | AFSF + ASSS | AF + SF + AS + SS | |
| % of CS ESTs hit |
92.64% |
93.97% |
93.60% |
92.89% |
91.65% |
90.63% |
| (% of bases covered) |
85.82% |
87.97% |
87.91% |
87.73% |
85.72% |
83.99% |
| % of CS ESTs hit with at least 98% of identity |
51.56% |
65.21% |
76.07% |
73.98% |
71.58% |
69.19% |
| (% of bases covered) | 59.46% | 65.15% | 69.54% | 81.52% | 79.25% | 77.08% |