Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Except Child. 2011 May;77(4):391–407. doi: 10.1177/001440291107700401

TABLE 1.

Effect Estimates for Treatment Condition

Outcome χ2/df(p)a CFI/TLI RMSEA I (p) Intercept σ2 S (p) ΔItotalb ΔItreatc
WJ Letter Word Identification 10.33/9 (.324) .99/.99 .05
 Treatment—individual 89.77 (<.001) 163.7 (<.001) −.549 (.110) .28 −.11
 Treatment—standard 91.09 (<.001) 108.7 (<.001) −.612 (.22) .44
 Comparison 86.34 (<.001) 131.2 (<.001) −.290 (.630)
WJ Word Attack 4.952/9 (.838) .99/.99 .001
 Treatment—individual 91.78 (<.001) 129.1 (<.001) .501 (.331) .14 −.27
 Treatment—standard 94.64 (<.001) 87.66 (<.001) −.743 (.139) .45
 Comparison 90.25 (<.001) 104.2 (<.001) .551 (.221)
WJ Spelling 6.36/9 (.703) .99/.99 .001
 Treatment—individual 88.11 (<.001) 167.7 (<.001) −.097 (.880) .31 −.06
 Treatment—standard 88.86 (<.001) 173.8 (<.001) −004 (.995) .36
 Comparison 84.07 (<.001) 194.6 (<.001) −.136 (.874)
TOWRE Sight Word 21.62/9 (.010) .97/.97 .154
 Treatment—individual 90.74 (<.001) 141.96 (<.001) .063 (.856) .24 .02
 Treatment—standard 90.57 (<.001) 87.55 (<.001) .363 (.452) .27
 Comparison 87.91 (<.001) 125.71 (<.001) .188 (.739)
TOWRE Phonemic Decoding 11.48/9 (.245) .99/.99 .068
 Treatment—individual 91.91 (<.001) 263.9 (<.001) .497 (.332) .26 .01
 Treatment—standard 91.70 (<.001) 212.1 (<.001) .513 (.318) .27
 Comparison 87.81 (<.001) 219.53 (<.001) 1.60 (.100)
WJ Passage Comprehension 13.67/9 (.135) .99/.99 .094
 Treatment—individual 84.84 (<.001) 109.4 (.007) −.967 (.062) .52 −.03
 Treatment—standard 85.10 (<.001) 100.2 (<.001) 0.00 (.000) .56
 Comparison 79.20 (<.001) 135.4 (<.001) .455 (.345)

Note. Values in bold italics differ from nonitalicized, nonbolded values at p < .05. CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation. TOWRE = Test of Word Reading Efficiency. WJ = Woodcock-Johnson test.

a

Represents the multigroup (N = 3) model with slope fixed.

b

ΔItotal represents the effect for the two treatment groups in relation to the comparison. Effect sizes were calculated as the difference in estimated means (i.e., model-derived intercepts) divided by the weighted, pooled standard deviation for each estimate, adjusted for small sample size using Hedges’s g formula.

c

ΔItreat represents the difference between the two treatment groups (i.e., standardized and individualized). Effect sizes were calculated as the difference in estimated means (i.e., model-derived intercepts) divided by the weighted, pooled standard deviation for each, adjusted for small sample size using Hedges’s g formula. Effects are reported in relation to the individualized treatment group.