Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;78(22):8045–8055. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02363-12

Table 4.

Comparison of the proportions of positive RAMS for each challenge strain per number of total RAMS collected using logistic regression

Baseline and comparison strain Value of logistic regression statistic for proportion of positive RAMSa
β SE (β) z value P value OR (95% CI)
Relative to FRIK 47
    Intercept 0.0890 0.1492 0.5960 0.5511 1.0930 (0.8159–1.4660)
    FRIK 1641 −1.8678 0.3349 −5.5770 2.45 × 10−8 0.1545 (0.0771–0.2893)
    FRIK 1641 Δstx2 −0.6837 0.2660 −2.5700 0.0102 0.5048 (0.2974–0.8457)
    FRIK 2533 −3.8731 0.7305 −5.3020 1.15 × 10−7 0.0208 (0.0033–0.0686)
Relative to FRIK 1641
    Intercept −1.7789 0.2999 −5.9320 2.98 × 10−9 0.1688 (0.0896–0.2930)
    FRIK 1641 Δstx2 1.1841 0.3720 3.1830 0.0015 3.2679 (1.6069–6.9703)
a

SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.