Table 1.
WMH Sample Characteristics
Country by income category1 |
Survey2 | Sample Characteristics3 |
Field Dates |
Age Range |
Sample Size4 | Response Rate5 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low and Lower-middle | Part I | Part II | Part II and Age ≤ 44 |
|||||
Colombia | NSMH | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents in all urban areas of the country (approximately 73% of the total national population) |
2003 | 18–65 | 4426 | 2381 | 1731 | 87.7 |
India | WMHI | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents in Pondicherry region. NR |
2003–5 | 18+ | 2992 | 1373 | 642 | 98.8 |
PRC | Shenzhen | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents and temporary residents in the Shenzhen area. |
2006–7 | 18+ | 7134 | 2476 | 1993 | 80.0 |
Upper-middle | ||||||||
Brazil | São Paulo Megacity |
Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents in the São Paulo metropolitan area. |
2005–7 | 18+ | 5037 | 2942 | -- | 81.3 |
Bulgaria | NSHS | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents. NR | 2003–7 | 18+ | 5318 | 2233 | 741 | 72.0 |
Lebanon | LEBANON | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents. NR | 2002–3 | 18+ | 2857 | 1031 | 595 | 70.0 |
Mexico | M-NCS | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents in all urban areas of the country (approximately 75% of the total national population). |
2001–2 | 18–65 | 5782 | 2362 | 1736 | 76.6 |
Romania | RMHS | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents. NR | 2005–6 | 18+ | 2357 | 2357 | -- | 70.9 |
High | ||||||||
Japan | WMHJ2002–2006 | Un-clustered two-stage probability sample of individuals residing in households in nine metropolitan areas (Fukiage, Higashi-ichiki, Ichiki, Kushikino, Nagasaki, Okayama, Sano, Tamano, and Tendo) |
2002–6 | 20+ | 3417 | 1305 | 425 | 59.2 |
New Zealand6 | NZMHS | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents. NR | 2004–5 | 16+ | 12790 | 7312 | 4119 | 73.3 |
United States | NCS-R | Stratified multistage clustered area probability sample of household residents. NR | 2002–3 | 18+ | 9282 | 5692 | 3197 | 70.9 |
The World Bank. (2008). Data and Statistics. Accessed September 17, 2008 at: http://go.worldbank.org/D7SN0B8YU0
NSMH (The Colombian National Study of Mental Health); WMHI (World Mental Health India);NSHS (Bulgaria National Survey of Health and Stress); LEBANON (Lebanese Evaluation of the Burden of Ailments and Needs of the Nation); M-NCS (The Mexico National Comorbidity Survey); RMHS (Romania Mental Health Survey); WMHJ2002–2006 (World Mental Health Japan Survey); NZMHS (New Zealand Mental Health Survey); NCS-R (The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication).
Most WMH surveys are based on stratified multistage clustered area probability household samples in which samples of areas equivalent to counties or municipalities in the US were selected in the first stage followed by one or more subsequent stages of geographic sampling (e.g., towns within counties, blocks within towns, households within blocks) to arrive at a sample of households, in each of which a listing of household members was created and one or two people were selected from this listing to be interviewed. No substitution was allowed when the originally sampled household resident could not be interviewed. These household samples were selected from Census area data in all countries. The Japanese sample is the only totally un-clustered sample, with households randomly selected in each of the four sample areas and one random respondent selected in each sample household. 6 of the 11 surveys are based on nationally representative (NR) household samples, while two others are based on nationally representative household samples in urbanized areas (Colombia, Mexico).
Brazil and Romania did not have an age restricted Part II sample. All other countries, with the exception of India (which was age restricted to ≤ 39), were age restricted to ≤ 44.
The response rate is calculated as the ratio of the number of households in which an interview was completed to the number of households originally sampled, excluding from the denominator households known not to be eligible either because of being vacant at the time of initial contact or because the residents were unable to speak the designated languages of the survey. The weighted average response rate is 75.0%.
New Zealand interviewed respondents 16+ but for the purposes of cross-national comparisons we limit the sample to those 18+.