Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr;85(1012):433–442. doi: 10.1259/bjr/30010948

Table 5. Univariate comparisons of technical factors used during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties according to the practitioners.

A (n=52)
B (n=30)
C (n=41)
Factors Mean Q1–Q3 Mean Q1–Q3 Mean Q1–Q3 p-value
Clinical factors
 BMI (kg m2) 27.4 24.4–30.1 27.7 25.0–29.4 28.2 25.0–30.4 0.75
 No dilatation material 3.8 2.0–6.0 3.2 1.0–5.0 3.4 1.0–5.0 0.10
Technical factors
 Length of fluoroscopy (min) 11.3 5.9–16.1 12.0 5.4–15.8 10.9 6.7–15.3 0.63
 Number of runs 17.1 12.0–22.0 15.5 9.0–23.0 16.8 10.0–22.0 0.07
 Number of cine frames 619 368–746 1074 557–1489 1183 618–1689 <0.0001
 % with only “low dose” mode at 12.5 fr s–1 40.4 80.0 41.5 <0.01
 % without any “low dose” mode at 25 fr s–1 100.0 100.0 65.9
 % without any “high dose” mode at 12.5 fr s–1 53.9 96.7 87.8 <0.0001
 % without any “high dose” mode at 25 fr s–1 92.3 93.3 87.8 0.66
 % without any collimation 0.0 63.3 19.5
 % without any 14 cm intensifier field 80.8 80.0 68.3 0.32
 % without any 23 cm intensifier field 78.9 86.7 82.9 0.66

fr, frames; Q1–Q3: first to third quartile.