Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 1;6(11):e1895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001895

Table 2. Collection of Chrysomya spp using different sampling methods.

Sampling method Wet season Dry season
n C. putoria C. albiceps n C. putoria C. albiceps
Females Males Females Males Females Males Females Males
Adult flies
Latrine exit traps 32 531 (74.5%) 182a (25.5%) 5 (71.4%) 2 (28.6%) 3 43 (91.5%) 4a (8.5%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Odor-baited latrine traps 5 50 (87.7%) 7 (12.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 72 467 (89.8%) 53 (10.2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Fish-baited traps 12 111 (91.7%) 10b (8.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 72 467 (77.1%) 139b (22.1%) 10 (100%) 0 (100%)
Total 48 692 (77.7%) 199 (22.3%) 5 (71.4%) 2 (28.6%) 147 977 (83.2%) 196 (16.8%) 10 (100%) 0 (0%)
Larvae
Latrine dipping 13 357 (100%) 0 (0%) 15 289 (100%) 0 (0%)

Letters a and b denote significant differences between the sex ratios of flies collected in different seasons, where a corresponds to p = 0.0142 and b with p<0.001; n = number of sampling occasions. Note that flies sampled from latrines in July are not included in the table since they were not separated into C. putoria and C. albiceps. For each sampling method surveys were each made over one to three weeks in the wet and dry season.