Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 2;91(5):890–896. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.09.003

Table 2.

Population Genetic and Epidemiological Parameters for AZFc-Related Deletions that Cause or Might Predispose to SSF

Deletion Type
b2/b4 gr/gr b1/b3
Prevalence in Population

Total number of men tested 20,884 19,113a 20,884
Number of men with deletion 9 427a 21
Percentage of men with deletion (95% CI) 0.043 (0.021–0.085) 2.2 (2.0–2.5) 0.10 (0.064–0.16)

Prevalence among Men with SSF

Total number of men tested 713 4,685 3,956
Number of men with deletion 42 194 10
Percentage of men with deletion (95% CI) 5.9 (4.3–7.9) 4.1 (3.6–4.8) 0.25 (0.13–0.48)
Source of data Oates et al.15 new data and literature (Table S7) new data and literature (Table S7)

Calculated Parameters

Relative risk of SSF (95% CI) 145 (85–310) 1.9 (1.6–2.2) 2.5 (1.2–4.6)
Percentage of deletion-bearing men who have SSF (bootstrap 95% CI) 100 (assumed 100) 1.4 (0.63–2.3) 1.8 (0.63–4.1)
Attributable risk percentage of SSFb (bootstrap 95% CI) 99 (99–100) 47 (39–54) 60 (17–78)
Population-attributable risk percentage of SSFc (bootstrap 95% CI) 5.9 (4.4–7.4) 2.0 (1.4–2.5) 0.15 (0.022–0.29)
μ (95% CI) 4.3 × 10−4 (= prevalence) (2.1 × 10−4 to 8.5 × 10−4)

We estimated parameters from prevalences in unselected populations and prevalences among men with SSF as discussed in the text and the Supplementary Note. The following abbreviations are used: CI, confidence interval; SSF, severe spermatogenic failure; and μ, mutation rate per father-to-son transmission of a Y chromosome.

a

For gr/gr deletions, we considered only the Polish and United States populations, which best matched the bulk of the data in the literature on gr/gr-deletion prevalence among men with SSF (Table S7).

b

In men with a given deletion, the percentage of SSF that is due to that deletion. Supplemental Data provide details of calculations.

c

The percentage of SSF due to the given deletion in the population.