Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Youth Soc. 2011 Jul 14;44(4):524–547. doi: 10.1177/0044118X11407526

Table 2b.

Group proportions for indicators of young adult functional status by suicide risk status.

Young adult functional status Group I, no observed risk (n = 561) Group II, emerged risk (n = 41) Group III, reduced risk (n = 112) Group IV, persisted risk |(n = 45) F statistic across the four groups Significant differences
Employed 0.72 (405) 0.54 (22) 0.77 (86) 0.60 (27) 3.66** III > II
Employed full-time 0.43 (243) 0.24 (10) 0.52 (58) 0.27 (12) 4.8*** III > II, IV
Post–high school education 0.59 (333) 0.36 (15) 0.60 (67) 0.44 (20) 3.87*** I > II & II < III*
Not in school and not working 0.13 (75) 0.32 (13) 0.11 (12) 0.22 (10) 4.67*** II > I, III
Public assistance 0.10 (55) 0.12 (5) 0.14 (16) 0.24 (11) 3.12** IV > I

Note: Dichotomous variables for functional status were coded as yes = 1, no = 0. Scores represent proportion of cases answering “yes.” Sub-sample (all yes’s) sizes in parentheses.

*

p < .10.

**

p < .05.

***

p <. 01.

****

p < .001.