Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;26(11):1896–1906. doi: 10.1210/me.2012-1188

Table 1.

Summary of binding data and cAMP activity results for RXFP1/2 chimeric constructs

Receptor construct pIC50
n pEC50
n
H2 relaxin INSL3 H2 relaxin INSL3
RXFP1 8.85 ± 0.05 5.55 ± 0.27 3 10.7 ± 0.04 No activity 3
RXFP12TMD ND ND 10.2 ± 0.08 No activity 3
RXFP12&β1 8.82 ± 0.34 6.44 ± 0.12 3 10.7 ± 0.17 <6 3
RXFP12&β1&TMD 8.96 ± 0.13 6.53 ± 0.17 3 10.2 ± 0.03 No activity 3
RXFP2&βN2 8.54 ± 0.29 6.26 ± 0.19 4 10.6 ± 0.14 <6 3
RXFP12&βN2&TMD 8.31 ± 0.19 6.19 ± 0.09 4 9.59 ± 0.20a No activity 3
RXFP12&β3 8.42 ± 0.25 6.57 ± 0.27 4 9.63 ± 0.05a 7.52 ± 0.06 3
RXFP12&β5 8.45 ± 0.30 7.09 ± 0.63b 4 10.56 ± 0.12 6.72 ± 0.05 3
Eu-INSL3 binding
RXFP12(N-LRR6) 7.58 ± 0.79 9.14 ± 0.08 3 7.17 ± 0.07c No activity 3
RXFP2 7.73 ± 0.06 9.14 ± 0.11 3 9.13 ± 0.06 10.2 ± 0.12 3
ECD-12&β1 ND 8.94 ± 0.19
ECD-1 ND 8.19 ± 0.20d,e

ND, not determined

a

P < 0.01 vs. RXFP1;

b

, P < 0.05 vs. RXFP1;

c

, P < 0.001 vs. all;

d

, P < 0.01 vs. RXFP2;

e

, P < 0.01 vs. RXFP12&β1.