Integration with Standard Occupational Classification System methodology |
Institutionalized database system |
Need for determining specific occupational titles and functional roles, nonduplication with other workforces |
|
Taxonomy by very specific occupational titles and functional roles |
Inclusion of disciplines and categories can be consensus-based process |
|
Reliance on decennial census |
Potential modification of Standard Occupational Classification System's decimal methodology |
|
Ineligibility if below “minimal” size of occupational title category |
Timeliness of data needs improvement |
Integration with Standard Occupational Classification System plus other complementary surveys |
Same features as for methodology |
More comprehensive approach |
|
Use of broad survey or study followed by more specific subset survey of title and responsibilities linked to public health |
Crosswalk capability to other industry databases (i.e., public health being an industry) |
|
|
Potential timeliness and coordination issues related to multiple surveys or databases |
|
|
Broadened scope and depth to public health workforce categories |
Case studies, smaller surveys |
Smaller settings |
More detailed or ancillary information capability in focused workforce settings |
|
Discrete focus on geography, job patterns, salaries, education, and so forth |
|
|
Increased utility for organizations and associations |
|
Credentialing system |
Credentialing mechanisms through licensing, certification, registration, core competencies, or equivalent |
Credentialing is expanding in the public health field |
|
Individual disciplines may require credentialing renewal |
Limitation may be associated with the multidisciplinary nature of the public health workforce |
|
Specific data repository and its management may be included |
Future formalized continuing education may be promoted by this approach |
|
|
Related efforts by recent accreditation mechanism for public health agencies |