Table 3.
baseline | control bread | pre- placebo treatment | placebo treatment | post- placebo washout | pre- AXOS treatment | AXOS treatment | post- AXOS washout | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bifidobacterium |
9.14 |
±0.57 |
9.37 |
±0.59 |
a |
9.32 |
±0.58 |
a |
9.31 |
±0.44 |
a |
9.33 |
±0.33 |
a |
9.39 |
±0.40 |
a |
9.40 |
±0.42 |
a |
9.34 |
±0.40 |
a |
|||
Clostridium histolyticumgroup |
8.35 |
±0.72 |
8.43 |
±0.69 |
|
8.07 |
±0.64 |
|
8.04 |
±0.76 |
a |
8.05 |
±0.85 |
a |
8.14 |
±0.79 |
|
8.13 |
±0.74 |
|
8.14 |
±0.57 |
|
|||
E. coli |
7.20 |
±0.39 |
7.35 |
±0.56 |
|
7.38 |
±0.47 |
a |
7.33 |
±0.40 |
|
7.34 |
±0.45 |
|
7.34 |
±0.53 |
|
7.34 |
±0.50 |
a |
7.40 |
±0.39 |
a |
|||
Lactobacillus – Enterococcus |
8.85 |
±0.54 |
8.92 |
±0.37 |
|
8.60 |
±0.66 |
|
8.95 |
±0.55 |
b |
8.72 |
±0.75 |
|
8.74 |
±0.69 |
|
9.05 |
±0.40 |
bc |
8.69 |
±0.71 |
|
|||
Atopobium‒Coriobacteriumgroup |
9.73 |
±0.24 |
9.80 |
±0.27 |
|
9.79 |
±0.28 |
|
9.84 |
±0.34 |
|
9.87 |
±0.26 |
a |
9.88 |
±0.28 |
a |
9.79 |
±0.21 |
|
9.87 |
±0.26 |
a |
|||
E. rectalegroup |
9.96 |
±0.27 |
9.87 |
±0.33 |
|
9.91 |
±0.33 |
c |
10.07 |
±0.29 |
ab |
10.08 |
±0.29 |
a b |
9.99 |
±0.33 |
|
10.01 |
±0.34 |
|
10.08 |
±0.32 |
a |
|||
Total bacteria |
10.73 |
±0.22 |
10.69 |
±0.22 |
|
10.70 |
±0.25 |
|
10.72 |
±0.20 |
|
10.68 |
±0.22 |
|
10.72 |
±0.18 |
|
10.81 |
±0.21 |
b |
10.72 |
±0.25 |
|
|||
Bacteroides |
9.54 |
±0.32 |
9.64 |
±0.44 |
|
9.85 |
±0.46 |
ac |
10.07 |
±0.25 |
ab |
10.11 |
±0.29 |
a b |
9.91 |
±0.42 |
ac |
9.99 |
±0.34 |
abc |
10.12 |
±0.22 |
a b |
|||
Roseburia – Eubacteria |
9.65 |
±0.21 |
9.69 |
±0.26 |
|
9.57 |
±0.44 |
|
9.79 |
±0.39 |
ab |
9.67 |
±0.51 |
|
9.74 |
±0.27 |
|
9.73 |
±0.32 |
|
9.61 |
±0.47 |
|
|||
Faecalibacterium prausnitziicluster | 9.57 | ±0.42 | 9.48 | ±0.44 | 9.53 | ±0.40 | 9.65 | ±0.33 | b | 9.52 | ±0.46 | 9.50 | ±0.51 | c | 9.56 | ±0.38 | 9.67 | ±0.41 | b |
A paired t-test was used to compare bacteria levels at different time points, for E. coli the non parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was used, as this data did not follow a normal distribution.
a - different to baseline; b- different to pre-treatment; c- different to washout, (p < 0.05).