Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;7:107. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-107

Table 2.

Prior studies examining SRS for brainstem metastases

Study Treatment modality Patients, n Mean age, y Median tumor volume, mL Median prescribed SRS Dose, Gy Median survival, mo Local tumor control, % Factors associated With shorter survival Complication rate
Huang et al. [8]
Gamma Knife
26
56
1.1
16
9
95
Presence of active extracranial disease
27%
Shuto et al. [13]
Gamma Knife
25
57.1
2.1 (mean)
13 (mean)
4.9
77
N/A
8%
Fuentes et al. [6]
Gamma Knife
28
57.7
2.1 (mean)
19.6 (mean)
12
92
N/A
0%
Yen et al. [14]
Gamma Knife
53
57.3
2.8 (mean)
17.6 (mean)
11
87
Presence of extracranial disease
0%
Hussain et al. [9]
Gamma Knife
22
60 (median)
0.9
16
8.5
100
N/A
5%
Kased et al. [10]
Gamma Knife
42
55 (median)
0.26
16
9
85
Multiple metastases, melanoma primary
10%
Lorenzoni et al. [15]
Gamma Knife
25
54
0.6 (mean)
20 (mean)
11.1
95
KPS <80, uncontrolled primary tumor, radiotherapy, SRS < 18 Gy
0%
Koyfman et al. [11]
Gamma Knife
43
59 (median)
0.37
15
5.8
85
Lower KPS, larger tumor volume, SIR, GPA
12%
Hatiboglu et al. [7]
Linac-based SRT/SRS
60
61 (median)
1
15
4.2
76
Tumor volume ≥4 mL, male sex
20%
Lin et al. [12]
Linac-based SRT/SRS
45
59.9
0.4
14
11.6
91
Lower KPS
4%
Present Study Linac-based SRT/SRS 36 61 0.94 17 3 93 Lower GPA, lower prescription dose, fewer fractions 8%