Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 22;83(5):504–510. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.736168

Table 3.

Overview of literature

Author and year Mean
age
Knees/
patients
Follow-up
(year)
Technique Score Results a Redislocation
Vahasarja 1995 13 57/48 4.2 MIxed b Insall E 20, G 20, F 11, P 6 13
Schneider et al. 1997 16 ?/17 10 Goldwaith procedure Bentley recurrent group: E 20%; G 20%, F 20%, P 10%
habitual group: E 43%; G 28%; F 14%; P 14%
1
Zeichen et al. 1998 21 ?/45c 6.5 prox. realignment with Larsen, first-time dislocation: E 3, G 10, F 2
Insall technique Lauridsen recurrent dislocation: E 7, G 12, F 10, P 1 1
Letts et al. 1999 14 26/22 2.4 Semi-membranosus Lysholm, E 6, G 12, P 4 1
tenodesis Zarins-Rowe
Marsh et al. 2006 14 30/20 6.2 modified Roux-Goldwaith Insall E 26, G 3, F 1 0
Ali et al. 2007 26 36/35 d 4.3 proximal arthroscopic Lysholm E+G 28, F 4, P 4 2
Joo et al. 2007 6 6/5 4.5 4 in 1 technique Kujala E 5, G 1 0
Oliva et al. 2009 13 ?/25 3.8 3 in 1 technique Cincinnati,
Kujala
scores increased significantly
from pre- to postoperative
1
Luhmann et al. 2011 14 27/23 5.1 proximal and/or distal
realignment surgery
Tegner,
Lysholm
mean Tegner 5.4
mean Lysholm 69.3
2

a E – excellent, G – good, F – fair, and P – poor

b Mixed: lateral release with or without medial reefment and/or Roux–Goldwaith procedure

c 15 first-time dislocations + 30 recurrent dislocations

d 24 dislocations + 12 subluxations