TABLE 2.
Comparison of B. thuringiensis serotypes to AFLP phylogenetic tree locationa
Serotype | Branch | No. in branch/total | Sourceb |
---|---|---|---|
H1 | B | 17/17 | 6 USA (1 Tex., 1 Ariz., 4 no data), 2 Czechoslovakia, 1 Yugoslavia, 7 no data, 1 ATCC 10792 type strain |
H2 | A | 1/10 | 1 no data |
C | 1/10 | 1 no data | |
F | 1/10 | 1 no data | |
G | 7/10 | 4 USA, 1 Egypt, 1 France, 1 no data | |
H3a | A | 4/8 | 1 England, 3 no data |
C | 1/8 | 1 no data | |
F | 3/8 | 1 Yugoslavia, 2 no data | |
H3a3b | C | 24/24 | 4 England, 4 USA (2 Tex., 2 Ariz.), 1 Canada, 15 no data |
H4a4b | A | 16/18 | 7 Japan, 1 Czechoslovakia, 1 Russia, 1 Yugoslavia, 6 no data |
B | 2/18 | 1 Czechoslovakia, 1 no data | |
H4a4c | C | 14/16 | 6 USA (1 Ariz., 4 Fla., 1 no data), 4 Japan, 1 Nairobi, 3 no data |
F | 1/16 | 1 no data | |
J | 1/16 | 1 Norway | |
H5a | C | 7/8 | 3 USA (2 La., 1 N.Mex.), 2 Chad, 1 Canada, 1 Japan |
F | 1/8 | 1 Russia | |
H5a5b | A | 1/21 | 1 China |
C | 19/21 | 11 USA (10 Tex., 1 no data), 1 Nigeria, 1 Russia, 6 no data | |
K | 1/21 | 1 Norway | |
H6 | C | 11/12 | 1 Canada, 10 no data |
F | 1/12 | 1 Norway | |
H7 | A | 1/17 | 1 no data |
C | 14/17 | 5 Japan, 4 USA (2 La., 1 Ca., 1 no data), 5 no data | |
F | 2/17 | 2 no data | |
H8c | H | 1/1 | 1 Norway |
H8a8b | A | 8/11 | 4 Japan, 1 Czechoslovakia, 1 England, 2 no data |
F | 1/11 | 1 no data | |
H | 2/11 | 2 Norway | |
H8a8c | B | 3/3 | 3 China |
H8a8d | A | 1/3 | 1 no data |
C | 1/3 | 1 no data | |
F | 1/3 | 1 no data | |
H9 | C | 4/5 | 2 USA (1 Ariz., 1 no data), 2 no data |
F | 1/5 | 1 France | |
H10c | A | 9/14 | 8 Japan, 1 USA (La.) |
C | 3/14 | 1 Japan, 1 USA (La.), 1 no data | |
H | 1/14 | 1 Japan | |
K | 1/14 | 1 Norway | |
H10a10b | H | 1/1 | 1 Norway |
H11c | K | 1/1 | 1 Norway |
H11a11b | A | 2/2 | 1 Germany, 1 no data |
H11a11c | F | 1/2 | 1 Japan |
H | 1/2 | 1 Japan | |
H12 | C | 3/3 | 1 USA, 2 no data |
H13 | C | 2/2 | 2 no data |
H14 | A | 10/13 | 2 Romania, 1 USA, 7 no data |
C | 3/13 | 1 Romania, 2 no data | |
H15 | C | 3/3 | 3 USA (2 N.Dak., 1 Ind.) |
H16 | C | 3/3 | 3 USA (2 La., 1 Ind.) |
H17 | F | 1/1 | 1 Japan |
H18 | C | 1/1 | 1 Japan |
H19 | F | 2/2 | 1 Japan |
1 Norway | |||
H20 | C | 2/3 | 1 USA (La.), 1 no data |
F | 1/3 | 1 India | |
H22 | H | 2/2 | 1 Norway |
1 China | |||
H24 | H | 1/2 | 1 no data |
K | 1/2 | 1 Norway | |
H27 | C | 1/1 | 1 no data |
H29 | K | 2/2 | 2 Norway |
H31 | K | 1/1 | 1 Norway |
H34 | F | 1/4 | 1 Yugoslavia |
J | 1/4 | 1 Norway | |
K | 2/4 | 2 Norway | |
H35 | H | 1/1 | 1 Norway |
AA | J | 2/2 | 2 Norway |
Not identified | C | 5/7 | 2 China, 1 USA (Ariz.), 1 England, 1 no data |
F | 1/7 | 1 no data | |
K | 1/7 | 1 Czechoslovakia |
The 36 different serotypes populated the entire phylogenetic tree. However, several serotypes were found primarily within a single branch. H1 isolates mapped to branch B and H3a3b and H2 isolates mapped to branch G, while H4a4b and H5a5b mapped to branch C.
Numbers refer to the number of isolates from that particular source.
Because of the changing classification in the H antigen typing of B. thuringiensis, isolates identified above only as H8, H10, and H11 were not scored as a distinct serotype (different from H8a8b, H8a8c, or H8a8d; H10a10b and H11a11b, or H11a11c).