Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2012 Aug 9;110(10):1534–1540. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.014

Table 5.

Cardiovascular risk factors and the association between cIMT and LV mass after minimal adjustment and adjustment for each risk factor separately.

Model Model R2 (%) Semi-partial R2 (%) Estimate of β±SE p-value
Basic model + smoking 30.9 1.08 4.31 ± 1.17 0.0002
Common IMT (per 0.1mm) 3.31 1.88 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
Basic model +attained diabetes duration 31.4 0.54 −0.30 ± 0.12 0.0094
Common IMT (per 0.1mm) 3.52 1.94 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
Basic model + mean SBP 36.5 5.14 0.42 ± 0.05 < 0.0001
Common IMT (0.1mm) 1.11 1.15 ± 0.30 < 0.0001
Basic model + mean LDL 32.3 0.43 −0.04 ± 0.02 0.0200
Common IMT (per 0.1mm) 3.69 1.97 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
Basic model + mean HbA1C 32.1 0.66 1.13 ± 0.39 0.0039
Common IMT (per 0.1mm) 3.00 1.81 ± 0.29 < 0.0001
Basic model + Any AER≥300/ESRD(ever) 37.0 5.64 10.90 ± 1.24 < 0.0001
Common IMT (per 0.1mm) 2.58 1.67 ± 0.28 < 0.0001
1

Basic model adjusted for attained age, gender, study cohort, MRI machine type, IMT reader and machine type,

The units are missing for SBP, LDL and Hba1c