Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 11;12:403. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-403

Table 3.

Cox univariate and multivariate analysis of distant disease-free survival

 
Univariate analysis (n ≤ 401)
Multivariate analysis (n = 377)
Variable HR* 95% CI p-value HR** 95% CI p-value
DTC status (IF and IC) (n=401) DTC+ vs DTC-
1.2
0.66-2.2
0.55
 
 
 
DTC status (IF) (n=327)
1.2
0.63- 2.2
0.60
 
 
 
DTC+ vs DTC-
 
 
 
DTC statuc (IC) (n=74) DTC+ vs DTC-
0.84
0.09-8.1
0.88
 
 
 
Age
0.99
0.97-1.02
0.61
 
 
 
per year
 
 
 
Node status
5.5
2.7- 11
< 0.001
3.4
1.6- 7.2
0.001
N+ vs N0
Tumor size
4.9
2.6-9.4
< 0.001
2.5
1.2- 5.2
0.01
> 20 mm vs ≤ 20 mm
NHG status
6.9
0.92-52
0.06
4.9
0.65-37
0.12
NHG 2 vs NHG 1
NHG 3 vs NHG 1
20
2.7- 147
0.004
8.7
1.1- 70
0.04
ER status
0.39
0.21-0.72
0.003
0.85
0.38- 1.9
0.7
ER+ vs ER-
PR status
0.43
0.24- 0.79
0.007
0.67
0.33- 1.4
0.3
PR+ vs PR-            

* No significant deviations from proportional hazards (Schoenfeld’s test).

* *P=0.05 in Schoenfeld’s global six degree-of-freedom test of proportional hazards.

Abbreviations: IF= immunofluorescence, IC=immunocytochemistry, HR= hazard ratio, CI= confidence interval, DTC= disseminated tumor cells, N0= node negative, N+= node positive, NHG= Nottingham histological grade, ER= oestrogen receptor, PR= progesterone receptor.