Table 2.
5-HTTLPR genotype | Coefficients | Genotype difference (LL vs. S carriers) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | ES | γ | SE | |
Partner PA predicting PA | |||||
S | .113*** | .031 | .102 | −.127* | .056 |
L/L | −.014 | .053 | −.028 | ||
Partner NDA predicting NDA | |||||
S | .035 | .038 | .031 | −.035 | .064 |
L/L | .000 | .056 | .000 | ||
Partner NSA predicting NDA | |||||
S | −.070** | .026 | −.090 | .114* | .051 |
L/L | .044 | .051 | .057 | ||
Partner NDA predicting NSA | |||||
S | −.051 | .041 | −.033 | .038 | .071 |
L/L | −.047 | .051 | −.038 | ||
Partner NSA predicting NSA | |||||
S | −.065* | .028 | −.075 | .078 | .056 |
L/L | .058 | .057 | .066 |
Note. ES = Effect size; standardized coefficient based on pooled within-person variance parameters. PA = positive affect, NDA = negative dominant affect, NSA = negative submissive affect, S = short allele carriers, L/L = long allele homozygotes.
p< .05;
p< .01;
p< .001.