Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2011 Dec 12;12(2):208–212. doi: 10.1037/a0026067

Table 2.

5-HTTLPR genotype interacting with pre-interaction partner affect to predict post-interaction affect

5-HTTLPR genotype Coefficients Genotype difference (LL vs. S carriers)
β SE ES γ SE
Partner PA predicting PA
S .113*** .031 .102 −.127* .056
L/L −.014 .053 −.028
Partner NDA predicting NDA
S .035 .038 .031 −.035 .064
L/L .000 .056 .000
Partner NSA predicting NDA
S −.070** .026 −.090 .114* .051
L/L .044 .051 .057
Partner NDA predicting NSA
S −.051 .041 −.033 .038 .071
L/L −.047 .051 −.038
Partner NSA predicting NSA
S −.065* .028 −.075 .078 .056
L/L .058 .057 .066

Note. ES = Effect size; standardized coefficient based on pooled within-person variance parameters. PA = positive affect, NDA = negative dominant affect, NSA = negative submissive affect, S = short allele carriers, L/L = long allele homozygotes.

*

p< .05;

**

p< .01;

***

p< .001.