Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(10):1627–1637. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181dde5f5

Table 5.

Baseline Capillary Loss Area within the ETDRS Macular Grid on FA (N=422 eyes for baseline analysis and N=244 eyes for change from baseline to 12 months analysis)

Baseline Capillary Loss Within Grida
0 >0 r
Baseline VA letter score (Snellen equivalent)b 0.06
 ≥84 (≥20/20) 38 (28%) 17 (22%)
 83–69 (<20/20 to 20/40) 63 (47%) 46 (60%)
 68–19 (<20/40 to 20/400) 34 (25%) 14 (18%)
 Total 135 (100%) 77 (100%)
Baseline Central Subfield Thickness 0.02
 < 300 61 (43%) 42 (51%)
 300 – < 425 55 (39%) 23 (28%)
 ≥ 425 25 (18%) 18 (22%)
 Total 141 (100%) 83 (100%)
Baseline Total Macular Volumec 0.09
 < 7 8 (7%) 3 (4%)
 7 – < 8 47 (44%) 23 (32%)
 8 – < 9 30 (28%) 19 (27%)
 ≥ 9 23 (21%) 26 (37%)
 Total 108 (100%) 71 (100%)
Baseline DME Area Within the Grid 0.24
 < 4 DA 87 (62%) 33 (40%)
 ≥4 DA 54 (38%) 50 (60%)
 Total 141 (100%) 83 (100%)
Baseline Retinal Thickening at Center of Macula 0.13
 None 39 (28%) 12 (14%)
 Questionable 17 (12%) 7 (8%)
 Definite, < 1X reference 21 (15%) 15 (18%)
 Definite, < 2X reference 61 (43%) 44 (53%)
 Definite, ≥ 2X reference 3 (2%) 5 (6%)
 Total 141 (100%) 83 (100%)
Baseline Fluorescein Leakage Within Gridd 0.30
 0 – < 3DA 85 (61%) 20 (24%)
 ≥ 3DA 55 (39%) 63 (76%)
 Total 140 (100%) 83 (100%)
Change in VAe, f 0.01
 ≥ 10 letters better 13 (14%) 6 (9%)
 within ± 9 letters 73 (77%) 51 (77%)
 ≥ 10 letters worse 9 (9%) 9 (14%)
 Total 95 (100%) 66 (100%)
Change in Fluorescein Leakage Within Gride 0.29
 > 0.5 DA better 58 (52%) 47 (66%)
 within ± 0.5 DA 40 (36%) 11 (15%)
 > 0.5 DA worse 13 (12%) 13 (18%)
 Total 111 (100%) 71 (100%)
Change in Central Subfield Thicknesse 0.06
 > 40 microns better 49 (44%) 34 (48%)
 within ± 40 microns 46 (41%) 25 (35%)
 > 40 microns worse 16 (14%) 12 (17%)
 Total 111 (100%) 71 (100%)
Change in DME Severity Scalee 0.02
 ≥ 2 levels better 32 (29%) 22 (31%)
 within ± 1 levels 56 (50%) 41 (58%)
 ≥ 2 levels worse 23 (21%) 8 (11%)
 Total 111 (100%) 71 (100%)
a

Missing for 198 eyes (24 nongradable and 174 not assessed).

b

Excluded 12 eyes with ocular abnormalities other than DME that were considered a likely cause of decreased visual acuity.

c

Missing for 45 eyes.

d

Missing for 1 eye.

e

Missing for 62 eyes (17 nongradable and 45 not assessed).

f

Excluded 21 eyes with ocular abnormalities other than DME that were considered a likely cause of decreased visual acuity.

OCT=Optical Coherence Tomography, DME=Diabetic Macular Edema, DA=Disc Area, VA=Visual Acuity