Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(10):1627–1637. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181dde5f5

Table 6.

Change in Fluorescein Leakage Area (Square Root Transformation) Within Grid (N=244 eyes)

Change in Fluorescein Leakage
N > 0.3 DD better* Within Grid within ± 0.3 DD > 0.3 DD worse r
Change in Visual Acuitya 0.22
 ≥10 letters better 19 (9%) 6 (3%) 1 (<1%)
 within ± 9 letters 83 (39%) 65 (30%) 14 (7%)
 ≥10 letters worse 10 (5%) 9 (4%) 8 (4%)
 Total 215
Change in Central Subfield Thickness 0.30
 > 40 microns better 66 (27%) 31 (13%) 12 (5%)
 within ± 40 microns 47 (19%) 46 (19%) 4 (2%)
 > 40 microns worse 13 (5%) 15 (6%) 10 (4%)
 Total 244
Change in OCT Volumeb 0.44
 >0.5 better** 57 (33%) 22 (13%) 3 (2%)
 within ±0.5 32 (18%) 40 (23%) 5 (3%)
 >0.5 worse 3 (2%) 5 (3%) 7 (4%)
 Total 174
Change in DME Area 0.39
 >0.3 DD better 68 (28%) 33 (14%) 6 (2%)
 within ±0.3 DD 31 (13%) 27 (11%) 4 (2%)
 >0.3 DD worse 27 (11%) 32 (13%) 16 (7%)
 Total 244
Change in DME Severity Scale 0.30
 ≥2 levels better 47 (19%) 23 (9%) 2 (<1%)
 within ± 1 level 59 (24%) 50 (20%) 16 (7%)
 ≥2 levels worse 20 (8%) 19 (8%) 8 (3%)
 Total 244
*

less leakage

**

reduction in OCT retinal volume

a

Excluded 29 eyes with ocular abnormalities other than DME that were considered a likely cause of decreased visual acuity.

b

Missing for 36 eyes at baseline, 21 eyes at 12 months, and 13 eyes at both baseline and 12 months.

OCT=Optical Coherence Tomography, DME=Diabetic Macular Edema, DD=Disc Diameter