. 2012 May;15(5):444–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01752.x

Table 1.

Fitness, genetic diversity, and mating system summary data for Swietenia macrophylla samples across Central America from contrasting provenances and landscape contexts (n_family, total number of families (i.e. mother trees) per group; n_progeny, total number of progeny across families per group; growth, mean block adjusted growth; H_j, mean observed multilocus heterozygosity of adults; Ĥ_j, mean observed multilocus heterozygosity of progeny; t_m, multilocus outcrossing rate; t_m − t_s, biparental inbreeding estimate; r_p, multilocus correlated paternity; standard deviations in parentheses; 95% confidence interval homogeneous subgroups indicated by ‘^a’, ‘^b’and ‘^c’)

Group	n_family, n_progeny	Growth (m³)	H_j	Ĥ_j	t_m	t_m − t_s	r_p
Central America	71 611	0.056 (0.012)	0.585 (0.24)	0.590 (0.104)	0.968 (0.010)	0.173 (0.020)	0.208 (0.026)
Provenance
Mesic	36 294	0.053 (0.013)^a	0.520 (0.224)^a	0.593 (0.139)^a	0.938 (0.018)^a	0.198 (0.031)^a	0.310 (0.045)^a
Dry	35 317	0.059 (0.010)^a	0.705 (0.162)^b	0.632 (0.056)^a	0.992 (0.033)^b	0.171 (0.038)^a	0.170 (0.030)^b
Landscape context
Forest	47 407	0.060 (0.010)^a	0.588 (0.224)^a	0.607 (0.096)^a	0.991 (0.020)^a	0.129 (0.026)^a	0.163 (0.024)^a
Isolated	24 204	0.048 (0.012)^b	0.579 (0.255)^a	0.556 (0.112)^a	0.925 (0.026)^b	0.250 (0.032)^b	0.341 (0.061)^b
Provenance and landscape context
Mesic forest	24 194	0.059 (0.011)^a	0.560 (0.214)^{a b}	0.604 (0.125)^a	0.987 (0.042)^a	0.148 (0.052)^a	0.254 (0.052)^a
Mesic isolated	12 100	0.043 (0.012)^b	0.440 (0.232)^b	0.503 (0.115)^a	0.845 (0.041)^b	0.314 (0.027)^b	0.445 (0.086)^b
Dry forest	23 213	0.062 (0.010)^a	0.687 (0.160)^a	0.611 (0.055)^a	0.992 (0.054)^a	0.149 (0.055)^a	0.153 (0.026)^c
Dry isolated	12 104	0.054 (0.010)^{a b}	0.740 (0.167)^a	0.610 (0.082)^a	0.992 (0.103)^a	0.208 (0.086)^a	0.278 (0.084)^a