Skip to main content
. 2012 May;10(4):443–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00677.x

Table 2.

Forage quality analysis of transgenic switchgrass plants

IVTDMD (%) ADL (mg/g DW) Crude protein (mg/g DW) Extractive component (mg/g DW)
Control 62.9 ± 1.4 75.1 ± 3.6 107.7 ± 5.2 281.7 ± 7.5
T-14 62.1 ± 0.4 82.3 ± 0.1 109.2 ± 0.6 283.3 ± 12.0
T-35 67.1 ± 0.1* 68.4 ± 0.8 110.0 ± 0.5 296.7 ± 3.3
T-40 64.5 ± 0.1 68.7 ± 1.0 123.5 ± 1.1* 266.7 ± 17.7
T-27 67.8 ± 0.1** 65.8 ± 1.9 118.7 ± 0.9 310.0 ± 5.8
T-32 66.5 ± 0.2* 68.5 ± 0.7 116.5 ± 1.9 296.7 ± 8.8
T-37 66.7 ± 0.3* 67.4 ± 0.2 120.5 ± 1.2 280.0 ± 11.6
T-34 70.3 ± 0.2** 70.2 ± 1.7 126.8 ± 0.5** 350.0 ± 10.0**
T-44 74.7 ± 0.3** 65.4 ± 2.2 143.3 ± 1.0** 353.3 ± 6.8**

ADL, acid detergent lignin; IVTDMD, in vitro true dry matter digestibility. *The transgenic and control plants were harvested after 6-month growth in the greenhouse. Value are mean ± SE (n = 3). One or two asterisks indicate significance corresponding to P < 0.05 or 0.01 (one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test).