Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 4;345:e5945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5945

Table 1.

 Characteristics of included studies of opiate substitution treatment (OST) and impact on HIV transmission

Study Follow-up Study type Recruitment site/method Inclusion criteria Sample size* HIV incidence (95% CI)† Intervention Impact of treatment on HIV seroconversion Confounders included in adjusted analyses
Effect measure Effect estimate (95% CI)
Studies included in meta-analysis
Bruneau, 2012 (unpublished)‡ Montreal Canada 1992-2008 Cohort Street, word of mouth, community programmes Age >18; injected for past 6 months 1374 2.57 (2.0 to 3.2) MMT in previous 6 months (yes/no) HR 0.2 (0.0 to 0.7), adjusted 0.3 (0.1 to 1.3) Age, sex, housing, cocaine use, heroin use, sharing, booting, having sex with person known to be HIV positive, period of recruitment
Chitwood, 1995, Miami, US39 1988-91 Nested case-control Drug treatment programme; street Cases: participants testing positive for HIV infection 1988-1991. Control: participants testing negative for HIV infection within 2 week period before date of first positive test of case 97 2.1 Methadone treatment in year before seroconversion or last negative test date (yes/no) OR 0.3 (0.1 to 0.9), adjusted 0.7 (0.2 to 2.8) Age, sex, ethnicity
Deren, 2012 (unpublished), Bayamon, Puerto Rico 1998-2002 Cohort Targeted sampling based on ethnographic mapping Age ≥18, injected drugs in previous 30 days, use of heroin in previous 48 hours, self identification as Puerto Rican 143 3.7 (2.3 to 6.1) MMT at baseline (yes/no) IRR 0.2 (0.0 to 3.5)
Deren, 2012 (unpublished), New York City, US As above As above As above 154 0.83 (0.3 to 2.2) MMT at baseline (yes/no) IRR 0.3 (0.0 to 2.4)
Judd, 2012 (unpublished), London, UK 2001-02 Cohort Community, such as needle and syringe exchange programmes or street settings Age <30; injecting ≤6 years; injected previous 4 weeks; address for follow-up 272 2.9 OST for ≥6 months in last year (yes/no) IRR 0.8 (0.2 to 3.2), adjusted 0.8 (0.2 to 3.2) Crack injection, homelessness
Kerr, 2006, Vancouver, Canada37 1996-2002 Cohort Street outreach; self referral Injected drugs in past month; resident in Vancouver region 1013 3.2 (2.6 to 3.7) Methadone treatment in previous 6 months (yes/no) RH 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1), adjusted 0.8 (0.5 to 1.4) Sex, aboriginal ethnicity, frequent cocaine injection, frequent heroin injection, requiring help injecting, binge drug use, having HIV positive sexual partner‡
Metzger, 1993, Philadelphia44 1989-91 Cohort Outpatient methadone programme; community outreach MMT: methadone programme participation; no MMT: >18 years; history of intravenous opiate use (≥3/week); no drug treatment in previous 10 months 185 3.0 in treatment; 10.7 out of treatment MMT over 18 month period (yes/no) OR 0.1 (0.0 to 0.5), adjusted 0.2 (0.1 to 0.6) Age, sex, ethnicity, needle sharing
Nelson, 2002, Baltimore, US8 1988-98 Cohort Community outreach Αge ≥18; free from AIDS at baseline; injected drugs in past 10 years 1846 3.1 (2.8 to 3.5) MMT in previous 6 mo (yes/no) IRR 0.6 (0.3 to 0.9)
Suntharasamai, 2009, Bangkok, Thailand17 1999-2003 Nested cohort in RCT Drug treatment clinics and community HIV negative; history of injected drug use in previous year; age 20-60; informed consent 2546 3.4 (3.0 to 3.9) MMT in previous 6 months (yes/no) HR 0.8 (0.6 to 1.0), adjusted 0.60 (0.4 to 0.8) Incarceration, injecting drugs, injecting daily, sharing injecting equipment, participation in methadone detoxification programme§
Van den Berg, 2007 Amsterdam, Netherlands45 1985-2005 Cohort Drug treatment clinics and self referral History of ever injecting drugs; negative for HIV and/or HCV negative at study entry or at start of injecting drug use 710 1.65 Any dose of MMT daily in previous 6mo (yes/no) IRR 0.4 (0.2 to 0.5)
Vanichseni, 2001, Bangkok, Thailand11 1995-98 Cohort Drug treatment clinic History of injected drug use; age 18-50; attendance at Bangkok Metropolitan Administration drug treatment clinics; not known to be HIV seropositive 1124 5.8 (4.8 to 6.8) MMT or detoxification in previous 4 months (yes/no) IRR 0.8 (0.5 to 1.3)
Williams, 1992, New Haven, US46 1992-98 Cohort Methadone maintenance programme History of injected drug use; past/current client of MMT programme; age ≥18 and one of three additional criteria** 98 2.8 Continuous MMT v interrupted MMT during follow-up IRR 0.2 (0.0 to 1.3)
Studies not included in meta-analysis
Moss, 1994 San Francisco, US43 1985-90 Cohort Methadone maintenance/ detoxification programmes; hospital HIV negative heterosexual people who inject drugs tested at least twice 681 1.9 ≤12 lifetime months in MMT (yes/no) HR 5.1, adjusted 4.0 Age, sex, ethnicity
Ruan, 2007, Xichang City, China38 2002-05 Cohort Community outreach and peer referral HIV seronegative; age ≥18; injected of drugs in previous 3 months; willing to provide informed consent 229 2.3 (1.1 to 3.5) MMT in previous 6 months (yes/no) MMT: 0 sc No MMT: incidence 2.9/100 person years
Serpelloni, 1994, Verona, Italy48 1985-91 Nested case-control Drug dependency unit HIV seronegative injecting drug users 80 No of cycles of MMT; daily dose; time out of treatment (previous 12 months) See footnote††
Zangerle, 1992, Innsbruck, Austria47 1985-90 Cohort Drug dependency or AIDS clinic Injecting drug users attending drug dependency or AIDS clinic of University of Innsbruck 102 5.8 MMT for ≥2 months duration (yes/no) MMT: 0/43 sc over mean 1.6 year; No MMT: 10/59 sc over mean 1.76 years (incidence 9.6/100 person years)

sc=seroconversions; MMT=methadone maintenance treatment; IRR=incidence rate ratio; RH=relative hazard; HR=hazard ratio; OR=odds ratio.

*Size of sample of HIV negative participants in analysis of impact of opiate substitution treatment on HIV incidence.

†As rate per 100 person years. Incidence relates to entire study period when such an estimate was provided in study.

‡Effect estimate adjusted for all variables significantly associated with time to HIV infection in univariate analyses at P≤0.1, as listed. Variables refer to preceding 6 months

§Effect estimate adjusted for all variables significantly associated with incident HIV infection at P≤0.1 in bivariate analysis, as listed.Variables refer to preceding 6 months.

¶Study participants with “no dependence” were excluded from analysis to calculate this estimate from reported data.

**Additional criteria for study entry included: had participated in 1982-83 study of hepatitis and had identifiable serum sample from that study in serum bank of researchers; had been in methadone programme consistently since 1982; or entered methadone programme between October 1985, and July 1988. Entry into 1982-83 hepatitis study required mild increases in transaminase activity without serological evidence of active hepatitis B infection at time of study (1982-83).

††Lower dose and more time out of treatment associated with increased risk of HIV infection in univariate but not multivariate analyses. Number of cycles of MMT not significantly associated with risk of HIV infection.